Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective

The independence of non-executive directors has long been a concern. The independent directors are not only required to be independent from management but also free from any other relationships which can interfere with their objectivity. Recently, the concern has been focused on long tenure of indep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malik @ Malek, Mazrah, Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi, Abdul Hamid, Mohamad Ali
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: Institute for Strategic and Sustainable Accounting Development, Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia 2016
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/67010/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/67010/1/ICAS%202016-2.pdf
_version_ 1848855730906464256
author Malik @ Malek, Mazrah
Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi
Abdul Hamid, Mohamad Ali
author_facet Malik @ Malek, Mazrah
Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi
Abdul Hamid, Mohamad Ali
author_sort Malik @ Malek, Mazrah
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The independence of non-executive directors has long been a concern. The independent directors are not only required to be independent from management but also free from any other relationships which can interfere with their objectivity. Recently, the concern has been focused on long tenure of independent directors. Regulators seem to believe that long tenure may impair independence, hence attempts to limit the tenure have been recommended, even though it has not been made mandatory. However, theories concerning long tenure are contradictory and empirical evidences are weak. Earlier studies are based on theory-driven approach, which only examines the association between directors’ tenure and proxies of financial reporting quality. This study on the other hand, proposes a different approach based on earnings response coefficient model which not only examines investors’ perceptions but also their reactions. This is based on the widely accepted independence model where independence should not only be in the form of fact but also appearance. The interaction between directors’ tenure and earnings performance is hypothesized to have a significant negative relationship with the cumulative abnormal return. Low perceived earnings quality in financial accounts from long tenure by investors is expected to result in lower coefficient of earnings. This study will provide additional literature and knowledge on the effect of independent directors’ tenure. It can assist regulators in revising the requirement for directors’ tenure.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T11:30:25Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id upm-67010
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T11:30:25Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Institute for Strategic and Sustainable Accounting Development, Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-670102019-03-06T05:38:03Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/67010/ Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective Malik @ Malek, Mazrah Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi Abdul Hamid, Mohamad Ali The independence of non-executive directors has long been a concern. The independent directors are not only required to be independent from management but also free from any other relationships which can interfere with their objectivity. Recently, the concern has been focused on long tenure of independent directors. Regulators seem to believe that long tenure may impair independence, hence attempts to limit the tenure have been recommended, even though it has not been made mandatory. However, theories concerning long tenure are contradictory and empirical evidences are weak. Earlier studies are based on theory-driven approach, which only examines the association between directors’ tenure and proxies of financial reporting quality. This study on the other hand, proposes a different approach based on earnings response coefficient model which not only examines investors’ perceptions but also their reactions. This is based on the widely accepted independence model where independence should not only be in the form of fact but also appearance. The interaction between directors’ tenure and earnings performance is hypothesized to have a significant negative relationship with the cumulative abnormal return. Low perceived earnings quality in financial accounts from long tenure by investors is expected to result in lower coefficient of earnings. This study will provide additional literature and knowledge on the effect of independent directors’ tenure. It can assist regulators in revising the requirement for directors’ tenure. Institute for Strategic and Sustainable Accounting Development, Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, Universiti Utara Malaysia 2016 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/67010/1/ICAS%202016-2.pdf Malik @ Malek, Mazrah and Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi and Abdul Hamid, Mohamad Ali (2016) Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective. In: International Conference on Accounting Studies (ICAS) 2016, 15-18 Aug. 2016, Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia. (pp. 94-99).
spellingShingle Malik @ Malek, Mazrah
Saidin, Saidatunur Fauzi
Abdul Hamid, Mohamad Ali
Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective
title Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective
title_full Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective
title_fullStr Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective
title_full_unstemmed Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective
title_short Directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective
title_sort directors' tenure and their independence: capital market perspective
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/67010/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/67010/1/ICAS%202016-2.pdf