Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis

Background: Despite being a very useful tool in programme evaluation, CBA struggles from the problems of valuating a diverse range of impacts from a program or intervention into monetary terms. Objectives: To review the methods that had been used in the valuation of impacts for CBA including the rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S., Intan Syafinaz, Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah, Ibrahim, Faisal, Manaf, Rosliza Abdul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Community Health Society Malaysia 2017
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/63674/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/63674/1/Valuation%20of%20impacts%20in%20cost%20benefit%20analysis.pdf
_version_ 1848854844355379200
author S., Intan Syafinaz
Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah
Ibrahim, Faisal
Manaf, Rosliza Abdul
author_facet S., Intan Syafinaz
Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah
Ibrahim, Faisal
Manaf, Rosliza Abdul
author_sort S., Intan Syafinaz
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Despite being a very useful tool in programme evaluation, CBA struggles from the problems of valuating a diverse range of impacts from a program or intervention into monetary terms. Objectives: To review the methods that had been used in the valuation of impacts for CBA including the recommendations related to the valuation as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Methodology: This is a review of literatures on methods for the valuation of impacts for CBA using major healthcare databases such as PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Also performed are hand searching of relevant articles, health reports, and papers issued by government bodies and international health organizations.Result and Discussion: Among the approaches that has generally been suggested for the valuation of impacts are; the human capital approach, revealed preferences and the contingent valuation method. The human capital approach is simple to operationalize but there are several economic and ethical disadvantages that reduces its applicability. The revealed preference approach is mostly applicable in the labour market, where wage premiums are offered to workers to accept more risky jobs. But besides safety, there are also a number of other factors that affect wages which may influence the result of the study. The contingent valuation method uses surveys in the valuation of its impacts but as this method involves hypothetical data, what people say they would pay might not necessarily be the amount that they would really pay in an actual situation. Conclusion: All three methods of valuation of impacts have its equal share of strengths and limitations, thus the decision to choose between the three methods will be a matter of situation, study objectives and preferences.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T11:16:19Z
format Article
id upm-63674
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T11:16:19Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Community Health Society Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-636742018-11-30T03:16:28Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/63674/ Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis S., Intan Syafinaz Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah Ibrahim, Faisal Manaf, Rosliza Abdul Background: Despite being a very useful tool in programme evaluation, CBA struggles from the problems of valuating a diverse range of impacts from a program or intervention into monetary terms. Objectives: To review the methods that had been used in the valuation of impacts for CBA including the recommendations related to the valuation as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Methodology: This is a review of literatures on methods for the valuation of impacts for CBA using major healthcare databases such as PubMed, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Also performed are hand searching of relevant articles, health reports, and papers issued by government bodies and international health organizations.Result and Discussion: Among the approaches that has generally been suggested for the valuation of impacts are; the human capital approach, revealed preferences and the contingent valuation method. The human capital approach is simple to operationalize but there are several economic and ethical disadvantages that reduces its applicability. The revealed preference approach is mostly applicable in the labour market, where wage premiums are offered to workers to accept more risky jobs. But besides safety, there are also a number of other factors that affect wages which may influence the result of the study. The contingent valuation method uses surveys in the valuation of its impacts but as this method involves hypothetical data, what people say they would pay might not necessarily be the amount that they would really pay in an actual situation. Conclusion: All three methods of valuation of impacts have its equal share of strengths and limitations, thus the decision to choose between the three methods will be a matter of situation, study objectives and preferences. Community Health Society Malaysia 2017 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/63674/1/Valuation%20of%20impacts%20in%20cost%20benefit%20analysis.pdf S., Intan Syafinaz and Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah and Ibrahim, Faisal and Manaf, Rosliza Abdul (2017) Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis. International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, 4 (4). 51 - 60. ISSN 2289-7577
spellingShingle S., Intan Syafinaz
Juni, Muhamad Hanafiah
Ibrahim, Faisal
Manaf, Rosliza Abdul
Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis
title Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis
title_full Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis
title_fullStr Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis
title_full_unstemmed Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis
title_short Valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis
title_sort valuation of impacts in cost benefit analysis
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/63674/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/63674/1/Valuation%20of%20impacts%20in%20cost%20benefit%20analysis.pdf