A comparative study of different machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of Uttarakhand area (India)

Landslide susceptibility assessment of Uttarakhand area of India has been done by applying five machine learning methods namely Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis (FLDA), Bayesian Network (BN), and Naïve Bayes (NB). Performance of thes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pham, Binh Thai, Pradhan, Biswajeet, Bui, Dieu Tien, Prakash, Indra, Dholakia, M. B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54823/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54823/1/A%20comparative%20study%20of%20different%20machine%20learning%20methods%20for%20landslide%20susceptibility%20assessment%20a%20case%20study%20of%20Uttarakhand%20area%20%28India%29.pdf
Description
Summary:Landslide susceptibility assessment of Uttarakhand area of India has been done by applying five machine learning methods namely Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Fisher's Linear Discriminant Analysis (FLDA), Bayesian Network (BN), and Naïve Bayes (NB). Performance of these methods has been evaluated using the ROC curve and statistical index based methods. Analysis and comparison of the results show that all five landslide models performed well for landslide susceptibility assessment (AUC = 0.910–0.950). However, it has been observed that the SVM model (AUC = 0.950) has the best performance in comparison to other landslide models, followed by the LR model (AUC = 0.922), the FLDA model (AUC = 0.921), the BN model (AUC = 0.915), and the NB model (AUC = 0.910), respectively.