Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process

The main objective of this paper is to present an action research conducted in a polytechnic in determining the effect of using digital studio on architectural diploma students for teaching the design process compared to the use of conventional studio. For the past three years part of the semester s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ismail, Mohd Arif, Mahmud, Rosnaini, Hassan, Isham Shah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2012
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/1/48049.pdf
_version_ 1848850975162368000
author Ismail, Mohd Arif
Mahmud, Rosnaini
Hassan, Isham Shah
author_facet Ismail, Mohd Arif
Mahmud, Rosnaini
Hassan, Isham Shah
author_sort Ismail, Mohd Arif
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The main objective of this paper is to present an action research conducted in a polytechnic in determining the effect of using digital studio on architectural diploma students for teaching the design process compared to the use of conventional studio. For the past three years part of the semester six students had been exposed to the use of digital studio for the design process in helping students to produce creative design and more alternative ideas. The semester six students were selected for this study because all of these students already had basic skills to produce three- dimensional digital model using AutoCAD which they learn in semester five. The creativity of the design products for this study had been evaluated using an instrument developed based on the Creative Product Analysis Matrix (CPAM) (Besemer and Treffinger 1981). The strength of the design products was not affected by the quality of students’ drawing, but depended a lot on the characteristics of creative products that were based on CPAM model. Students were involved with the use of a digital studio in the design process using AutoCAD, SketchUp, 3D Studio Viz and Lumions. This study involved architectural students with 12 different design projects in the period of three years. For the research purposes students were divided into two groups, one group involved in design activities using digital studio and the other group involved in design activities using conventional method. In this study no new digital studio was built physically, but every student was involved with the use of a digital studio in the design process required to carry out design activities in CAD lab, or students were asked to use their laptop in the studio. This study shows that students from groups that used digital studio in the design process produce more alternative ideas. Study also shows the digital design method can produce more complex and dynamic design ideas.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T10:14:49Z
format Article
id upm-48049
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T10:14:49Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-480492016-08-04T08:37:14Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/ Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process Ismail, Mohd Arif Mahmud, Rosnaini Hassan, Isham Shah The main objective of this paper is to present an action research conducted in a polytechnic in determining the effect of using digital studio on architectural diploma students for teaching the design process compared to the use of conventional studio. For the past three years part of the semester six students had been exposed to the use of digital studio for the design process in helping students to produce creative design and more alternative ideas. The semester six students were selected for this study because all of these students already had basic skills to produce three- dimensional digital model using AutoCAD which they learn in semester five. The creativity of the design products for this study had been evaluated using an instrument developed based on the Creative Product Analysis Matrix (CPAM) (Besemer and Treffinger 1981). The strength of the design products was not affected by the quality of students’ drawing, but depended a lot on the characteristics of creative products that were based on CPAM model. Students were involved with the use of a digital studio in the design process using AutoCAD, SketchUp, 3D Studio Viz and Lumions. This study involved architectural students with 12 different design projects in the period of three years. For the research purposes students were divided into two groups, one group involved in design activities using digital studio and the other group involved in design activities using conventional method. In this study no new digital studio was built physically, but every student was involved with the use of a digital studio in the design process required to carry out design activities in CAD lab, or students were asked to use their laptop in the studio. This study shows that students from groups that used digital studio in the design process produce more alternative ideas. Study also shows the digital design method can produce more complex and dynamic design ideas. Elsevier 2012 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/1/48049.pdf Ismail, Mohd Arif and Mahmud, Rosnaini and Hassan, Isham Shah (2012) Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64. pp. 18-25. ISSN 1877-0428 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812049804 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.003
spellingShingle Ismail, Mohd Arif
Mahmud, Rosnaini
Hassan, Isham Shah
Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process
title Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process
title_full Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process
title_fullStr Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process
title_full_unstemmed Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process
title_short Digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process
title_sort digital studio vs. conventional in teaching architectural design process
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/48049/1/48049.pdf