Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation

Mulching materials from oil palm residues such as pruned palm fronds (OPF), empty fruit bunches (EFB), and Eco-mat (ECO; a compressed EFB mat) are often the recommended soil and water conservation practices (CP) for oil palm plantations on hill slopes. Another recommended CP is the construction of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moradi, Abolfath, Teh, Christopher Boon Sung, Goh, Kah Joo, Mohd Hanif, Ahmad Husni, Ishak, Che Fauziah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37249/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37249/1/Effect%20of%20four%20soil%20and%20water%20conservation%20practices%20on%20soil%20physical%20processes%20in%20a%20non.pdf
_version_ 1848848557531987968
author Moradi, Abolfath
Teh, Christopher Boon Sung
Goh, Kah Joo
Mohd Hanif, Ahmad Husni
Ishak, Che Fauziah
author_facet Moradi, Abolfath
Teh, Christopher Boon Sung
Goh, Kah Joo
Mohd Hanif, Ahmad Husni
Ishak, Che Fauziah
author_sort Moradi, Abolfath
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Mulching materials from oil palm residues such as pruned palm fronds (OPF), empty fruit bunches (EFB), and Eco-mat (ECO; a compressed EFB mat) are often the recommended soil and water conservation practices (CP) for oil palm plantations on hill slopes. Another recommended CP is the construction of silt pits or trenches (SIL) across the hill slope to capture runoff and then return the water and nutrients into the surrounding soil. Although these four CP are recommended practices, their relative effects on improving soil physical properties and on increasing the soil water content have never been compared with one another. Consequently, the objective of this study was to fill in this knowledge gap. A three-year field experiment was conducted in a non-terraced oil palm plantation, and soil samples from 0 to 0.15, 0.15 to 0.30, and 0.30 to 0.45 m depths were collected every three months and analyzed for their soil physical properties. Soil water content up to 0.75 m depth was also measured daily. EFB released the highest amount of organic matter and nutrients into the soil compared to OPF, ECO, and SIL. Hence, EFB was most effective to increase soil aggregation, aggregate stability, soil water retention at field capacity, available soil water content, and the relative proportion of soil mesopores. Due to these improved soil physical properties, EFB also gave the highest soil water content. Unlike ECO that concentrated more water in the upper soil layers, EFB distributed the soil water more uniformly throughout the whole soil profile, but SIL concentrated more soil water in the lower soil layers (>0.30 m) because the water levels in the pits were often below 0.30 m from the soil surface. The large opening area of the silt pits could have also caused large evaporative water losses from the pits. EFB mulching is recommended as the best CP, particularly for oil palm plantations on hill slopes.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T09:36:24Z
format Article
id upm-37249
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T09:36:24Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-372492016-03-18T03:33:53Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37249/ Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation Moradi, Abolfath Teh, Christopher Boon Sung Goh, Kah Joo Mohd Hanif, Ahmad Husni Ishak, Che Fauziah Mulching materials from oil palm residues such as pruned palm fronds (OPF), empty fruit bunches (EFB), and Eco-mat (ECO; a compressed EFB mat) are often the recommended soil and water conservation practices (CP) for oil palm plantations on hill slopes. Another recommended CP is the construction of silt pits or trenches (SIL) across the hill slope to capture runoff and then return the water and nutrients into the surrounding soil. Although these four CP are recommended practices, their relative effects on improving soil physical properties and on increasing the soil water content have never been compared with one another. Consequently, the objective of this study was to fill in this knowledge gap. A three-year field experiment was conducted in a non-terraced oil palm plantation, and soil samples from 0 to 0.15, 0.15 to 0.30, and 0.30 to 0.45 m depths were collected every three months and analyzed for their soil physical properties. Soil water content up to 0.75 m depth was also measured daily. EFB released the highest amount of organic matter and nutrients into the soil compared to OPF, ECO, and SIL. Hence, EFB was most effective to increase soil aggregation, aggregate stability, soil water retention at field capacity, available soil water content, and the relative proportion of soil mesopores. Due to these improved soil physical properties, EFB also gave the highest soil water content. Unlike ECO that concentrated more water in the upper soil layers, EFB distributed the soil water more uniformly throughout the whole soil profile, but SIL concentrated more soil water in the lower soil layers (>0.30 m) because the water levels in the pits were often below 0.30 m from the soil surface. The large opening area of the silt pits could have also caused large evaporative water losses from the pits. EFB mulching is recommended as the best CP, particularly for oil palm plantations on hill slopes. Elsevier 2015-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37249/1/Effect%20of%20four%20soil%20and%20water%20conservation%20practices%20on%20soil%20physical%20processes%20in%20a%20non.pdf Moradi, Abolfath and Teh, Christopher Boon Sung and Goh, Kah Joo and Mohd Hanif, Ahmad Husni and Ishak, Che Fauziah (2015) Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation. Soil and Tillage Research, 145. pp. 62-71. ISSN 0167-1987 10.1016/j.still.2014.08.005
spellingShingle Moradi, Abolfath
Teh, Christopher Boon Sung
Goh, Kah Joo
Mohd Hanif, Ahmad Husni
Ishak, Che Fauziah
Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation
title Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation
title_full Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation
title_fullStr Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation
title_short Effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation
title_sort effect of four soil and water conservation practices on soil physical processes in a non-terraced oil palm plantation
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37249/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37249/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37249/1/Effect%20of%20four%20soil%20and%20water%20conservation%20practices%20on%20soil%20physical%20processes%20in%20a%20non.pdf