A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy
This study aimed to evaluate the rural area learners’ writing self-efficacy using two different approaches which are qualitative and quantitative approach. Basically, it is a case study where three form four students and a teacher were involved in the research for six months. In this study, the lear...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Educative Research Foundation and Publisher
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/36238/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/36238/1/A%20qualitative%20and%20quantitative%20approach%20in%20evaluating%20writing%20self.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848848276554514432 |
|---|---|
| author | Jalaluddin, Ilyana |
| author_facet | Jalaluddin, Ilyana |
| author_sort | Jalaluddin, Ilyana |
| building | UPM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This study aimed to evaluate the rural area learners’ writing self-efficacy using two different approaches which are qualitative and quantitative approach. Basically, it is a case study where three form four students and a teacher were involved in the research for six months. In this study, the learners’ writing self-efficacy was investigated using a combination of quantitative (writing self-efficacy scale adapted from Bottomley, Henk, & Melnick, 1997) and qualitative (classroom observation). Classroom observation was based on three characteristics: persistence in accomplishing language tasks, self-awareness of English proficiency, and willingness to engage in language activities. These characteristics which were used by Wang and Pape (2007) were based on Bandura’s (1997) concept of self-efficacy. Overall, this study did not focus on the score of WSE scales alone but also placed a heavy emphasis on the perceptions and actions of the form four students and teacher. This was done through 15 non-participant classroom observations, 10 interviews with each of the three students and 10 teacher’s interviews to understand the participants’ self-efficacy phenomena in their learning to write. Findings showed that the combination of different method of collecting data for writing self-efficacy was a feasible way in explaining rural learners’ writing self-efficacy development. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T09:31:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | upm-36238 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T09:31:56Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | International Educative Research Foundation and Publisher |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | upm-362382015-10-05T00:41:07Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/36238/ A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy Jalaluddin, Ilyana This study aimed to evaluate the rural area learners’ writing self-efficacy using two different approaches which are qualitative and quantitative approach. Basically, it is a case study where three form four students and a teacher were involved in the research for six months. In this study, the learners’ writing self-efficacy was investigated using a combination of quantitative (writing self-efficacy scale adapted from Bottomley, Henk, & Melnick, 1997) and qualitative (classroom observation). Classroom observation was based on three characteristics: persistence in accomplishing language tasks, self-awareness of English proficiency, and willingness to engage in language activities. These characteristics which were used by Wang and Pape (2007) were based on Bandura’s (1997) concept of self-efficacy. Overall, this study did not focus on the score of WSE scales alone but also placed a heavy emphasis on the perceptions and actions of the form four students and teacher. This was done through 15 non-participant classroom observations, 10 interviews with each of the three students and 10 teacher’s interviews to understand the participants’ self-efficacy phenomena in their learning to write. Findings showed that the combination of different method of collecting data for writing self-efficacy was a feasible way in explaining rural learners’ writing self-efficacy development. International Educative Research Foundation and Publisher 2014-07 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/36238/1/A%20qualitative%20and%20quantitative%20approach%20in%20evaluating%20writing%20self.pdf Jalaluddin, Ilyana (2014) A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2 (7). pp. 26-36. ISSN 2411-3123; ESSN: 2411-2933 http://www.ijier.net/july2014.html |
| spellingShingle | Jalaluddin, Ilyana A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy |
| title | A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy |
| title_full | A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy |
| title_fullStr | A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy |
| title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy |
| title_short | A qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy |
| title_sort | qualitative and quantitative approach in evaluating writing self-efficacy |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/36238/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/36238/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/36238/1/A%20qualitative%20and%20quantitative%20approach%20in%20evaluating%20writing%20self.pdf |