The impact of animal source food (ASF) on the growth of malnourished children in Bachok, Kelantan: randomized controlled intervention trial

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Animal Source Food on the growth of Malaysian malnourished children in Bachok Kelantan. Method: A six months Animal Source Food (ASF) intervention trial was carried out with 90 malnourished children, aged 2-10 years, from food insecure h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naser, Ihab Ali, Abdul Jalil, Rohana, Wan Muda, Wan Abdul Manan, Wan Nik, Wan Suriati, Mohd Shariff, Zalilah, Abdullah, Mohamed Rusli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: OMICS International 2014
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/35708/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/35708/1/the-impact-of-animal-source-food-asf-on-the-growth-of-malnourished-children-in-bachok-kelantan-randomized-controlled-intervention-trial-2155-9600.1000321.pdf
Description
Summary:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Animal Source Food on the growth of Malaysian malnourished children in Bachok Kelantan. Method: A six months Animal Source Food (ASF) intervention trial was carried out with 90 malnourished children, aged 2-10 years, from food insecure households in Bachok, Malaysian. Children were randomized into three groups: Milk Group (n=30) consumed two boxes of 250 ml milk daily over the study period, Egg Group (n=30) received two eggs daily and Control Group (n=30) children who did not receive any food intervention. Anthropometric data were collected at baseline, after 3 and 6 months of the intervention trial. Results: Over the 6 months study period there was a significant increase in children’s height for all groups (Milk Group; 3.62 cm; p<0.001, Egg Group; 3.51 cm , p<0.001, Control Group; 2.55 cm, p<0.001), weight (Milk Group; 1.72 kg; p<0.001, Egg Group; 1.67 kg, p<0.001, Control Group; 0.87 kg. p<0.001), and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) (Milk Group; 0.80 cm; p<0.001, Egg Group; 0.78 cm, p<0.001, Control Group; 0.31 cm; p=0.023). Conclusion: The impact of the intervention was positive but the effectiveness was not large enough to define as success of the intervention program.