A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice

A study on the heat processing of tomato juice was conducted using a low water level (LWL) hot water bath in comparison to the conventional recommended high water level (HWL) bath procedure. The L WL bath contained one-fifth the amount of water recommended for the HWL bath. The results indicated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Che Man, Yaakob, Collins, Jimmie L.
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: 1982
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/2100/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/2100/1/A_Comparison_of_Energy_Usage_in_the_Home_Canning_of_Tomato_Juice.pdf
_version_ 1848839150570045440
author Che Man, Yaakob
Collins, Jimmie L.
author_facet Che Man, Yaakob
Collins, Jimmie L.
author_sort Che Man, Yaakob
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description A study on the heat processing of tomato juice was conducted using a low water level (LWL) hot water bath in comparison to the conventional recommended high water level (HWL) bath procedure. The L WL bath contained one-fifth the amount of water recommended for the HWL bath. The results indicated that the temperatures of the juice during processing were similar in both procedures. However, use of the HWL bath required 59 minutes and 1838 watt-hours of electricity to heat the bath and process hot packed (920 C) juice for 15 minutes. In contrast, only 34 minutes and 1065 watt-hours ofelectricity were required when the L WL bath was used.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T07:06:53Z
format Article
id upm-2100
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T07:06:53Z
publishDate 1982
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-21002013-05-27T06:58:49Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/2100/ A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice Che Man, Yaakob Collins, Jimmie L. A study on the heat processing of tomato juice was conducted using a low water level (LWL) hot water bath in comparison to the conventional recommended high water level (HWL) bath procedure. The L WL bath contained one-fifth the amount of water recommended for the HWL bath. The results indicated that the temperatures of the juice during processing were similar in both procedures. However, use of the HWL bath required 59 minutes and 1838 watt-hours of electricity to heat the bath and process hot packed (920 C) juice for 15 minutes. In contrast, only 34 minutes and 1065 watt-hours ofelectricity were required when the L WL bath was used. 1982 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/2100/1/A_Comparison_of_Energy_Usage_in_the_Home_Canning_of_Tomato_Juice.pdf Che Man, Yaakob and Collins, Jimmie L. (1982) A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice. Pertanika, 5 (2). pp. 160-163. English
spellingShingle Che Man, Yaakob
Collins, Jimmie L.
A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice
title A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice
title_full A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice
title_fullStr A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice
title_short A Comparison of Energy Usage in the Home Canning of Tomato Juice
title_sort comparison of energy usage in the home canning of tomato juice
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/2100/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/2100/1/A_Comparison_of_Energy_Usage_in_the_Home_Canning_of_Tomato_Juice.pdf