An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.

The NH4OAc (pH7.0),leaching and shaking,BaCI2-TEA (pH8.2) and the Gillman compulsive exchange methods for the determination of cation exchange capacity (CEC) were evaluated. It was found that the NH4OAc (pH7.0),leaching and shaking methods gave comparable CEC values for most of the soils used. Of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ismail, Jamilah, Ishak , Che Fauziah
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/19825/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/19825/1/ID%2019825.pdf
_version_ 1848843829888679936
author Ismail, Jamilah
Ishak , Che Fauziah
author_facet Ismail, Jamilah
Ishak , Che Fauziah
author_sort Ismail, Jamilah
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The NH4OAc (pH7.0),leaching and shaking,BaCI2-TEA (pH8.2) and the Gillman compulsive exchange methods for the determination of cation exchange capacity (CEC) were evaluated. It was found that the NH4OAc (pH7.0),leaching and shaking methods gave comparable CEC values for most of the soils used. Of the methods selected,BaCI2-TEA (pH8.2) gave the highest CEC values and the Gillman methods,which was determined at the field pH and ionic strength,gave the lowest CEC values. From the correlation studies,the best correlation was obtained between the NH4OAc (pH7.0)and BaCI2-TEA (pH8.2)methods. There were no significant correlation between the Gillman method and the other three methods studied.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T08:21:15Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id upm-19825
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T08:21:15Z
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-198252014-03-07T03:42:27Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/19825/ An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity. Ismail, Jamilah Ishak , Che Fauziah The NH4OAc (pH7.0),leaching and shaking,BaCI2-TEA (pH8.2) and the Gillman compulsive exchange methods for the determination of cation exchange capacity (CEC) were evaluated. It was found that the NH4OAc (pH7.0),leaching and shaking methods gave comparable CEC values for most of the soils used. Of the methods selected,BaCI2-TEA (pH8.2) gave the highest CEC values and the Gillman methods,which was determined at the field pH and ionic strength,gave the lowest CEC values. From the correlation studies,the best correlation was obtained between the NH4OAc (pH7.0)and BaCI2-TEA (pH8.2)methods. There were no significant correlation between the Gillman method and the other three methods studied. Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/19825/1/ID%2019825.pdf Ismail, Jamilah and Ishak , Che Fauziah An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity. In: Seminar & 9th Meeting on Standardization of Soil & Plant Analyses in Malaysia., 30 Mac 1988., Hotel Merlin,Kuala Lumpur.. . English
spellingShingle Ismail, Jamilah
Ishak , Che Fauziah
An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.
title An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.
title_full An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.
title_fullStr An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.
title_short An evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.
title_sort evaluation of methods for the determination of cation exchanges capacity.
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/19825/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/19825/1/ID%2019825.pdf