Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965)

In the history of modern Malay literature, the 1960s are labelled by many literary critics as era picisan (the age of dime fiction) because of the flood of karya picisan (dime fiction) in the local market. Karya picisan here refers to works that clearly manipulate sexual themes, with the intent of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abd Rani, Mohd Zariat
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Universitas Indonesia 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13387/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13387/1/Between%20eroticism%20and%20social%20criticism.pdf
_version_ 1848842099614547968
author Abd Rani, Mohd Zariat
author_facet Abd Rani, Mohd Zariat
author_sort Abd Rani, Mohd Zariat
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In the history of modern Malay literature, the 1960s are labelled by many literary critics as era picisan (the age of dime fiction) because of the flood of karya picisan (dime fiction) in the local market. Karya picisan here refers to works that clearly manipulate sexual themes, with the intent of conjuring an atmosphere of eroticism to attract readers. Critics generally do not consider these works to be karya sastra(literary works) because they do not fulfil two important criteria that commonly classify the term ‘literature’, namely bahasa yang indah (aesthetic language) and isi yang berfaedah (beneficial content). In the context of this definition of ‘literature’, Shahnon Ahmad’s 1965 novel Terdedah is considered problematic because of incongruities in the estimation of its ‘literariness’. As opposed to critics who initially labelled it karya picisan, the ‘literariness’ of Terdedah was defended by its own author because it contained elements social criticism. This difference in opinion raises an important point regarding the commonly accepted definitions of ‘literature’ and ‘literariness’ in Malay literature: after Shahnon proclaimed his novel’s worth based on its social criticism, critical reception towards Terdedah showed an unmistakable shift. With respect to this shift of opinion, this article will perform a critical analysis of the meaning of ‘literariness’ in relation to Terdedah, and in doing so, clearly determine its status as either a karya picisan or karya sastra, based on the definition of ‘literature’ practised in Malay literature.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T07:53:45Z
format Article
id upm-13387
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T07:53:45Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Universitas Indonesia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-133872016-07-22T03:17:30Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13387/ Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965) Abd Rani, Mohd Zariat In the history of modern Malay literature, the 1960s are labelled by many literary critics as era picisan (the age of dime fiction) because of the flood of karya picisan (dime fiction) in the local market. Karya picisan here refers to works that clearly manipulate sexual themes, with the intent of conjuring an atmosphere of eroticism to attract readers. Critics generally do not consider these works to be karya sastra(literary works) because they do not fulfil two important criteria that commonly classify the term ‘literature’, namely bahasa yang indah (aesthetic language) and isi yang berfaedah (beneficial content). In the context of this definition of ‘literature’, Shahnon Ahmad’s 1965 novel Terdedah is considered problematic because of incongruities in the estimation of its ‘literariness’. As opposed to critics who initially labelled it karya picisan, the ‘literariness’ of Terdedah was defended by its own author because it contained elements social criticism. This difference in opinion raises an important point regarding the commonly accepted definitions of ‘literature’ and ‘literariness’ in Malay literature: after Shahnon proclaimed his novel’s worth based on its social criticism, critical reception towards Terdedah showed an unmistakable shift. With respect to this shift of opinion, this article will perform a critical analysis of the meaning of ‘literariness’ in relation to Terdedah, and in doing so, clearly determine its status as either a karya picisan or karya sastra, based on the definition of ‘literature’ practised in Malay literature. Universitas Indonesia 2009 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13387/1/Between%20eroticism%20and%20social%20criticism.pdf Abd Rani, Mohd Zariat (2009) Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965). Wacana, 11 (1 ). pp. 159-172. Malay literature Erotic literature, Malay - History and criticism English
spellingShingle Malay literature
Erotic literature, Malay - History and criticism
Abd Rani, Mohd Zariat
Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965)
title Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965)
title_full Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965)
title_fullStr Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965)
title_full_unstemmed Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965)
title_short Between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of Shahnon Ahmad's terdedah (1965)
title_sort between eroticism and social criticism : the literariness of shahnon ahmad's terdedah (1965)
topic Malay literature
Erotic literature, Malay - History and criticism
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13387/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13387/1/Between%20eroticism%20and%20social%20criticism.pdf