Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations

Four different formulations of rice‐soy snack containing 4.5%, 9.0%, 13.5%, and 18.0% full‐fat soy flour (FFSF) were evaluated for their nutritional values and acceptance. Protein content increased from 9.54% to 15.44% and chemical scores of the snacks from 86 to 100 but there was no difference in N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Man, Yaakob B. Che, Abdul Karim, Mohamad N.B., Kun, Tan T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 1992
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/1/118786.pdf
_version_ 1848867787390320640
author Man, Yaakob B. Che
Abdul Karim, Mohamad N.B.
Kun, Tan T.
author_facet Man, Yaakob B. Che
Abdul Karim, Mohamad N.B.
Kun, Tan T.
author_sort Man, Yaakob B. Che
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Four different formulations of rice‐soy snack containing 4.5%, 9.0%, 13.5%, and 18.0% full‐fat soy flour (FFSF) were evaluated for their nutritional values and acceptance. Protein content increased from 9.54% to 15.44% and chemical scores of the snacks from 86 to 100 but there was no difference in Net Protein Utilization although values were higher in snacks than in either rice or FFSF alone. All formulations were well accepted but at the highest level of FFSF (18%) acceptability was significantly (P<0.01) reduced. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
first_indexed 2025-11-15T14:42:03Z
format Article
id upm-118786
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T14:42:03Z
publishDate 1992
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1187862025-07-23T09:25:21Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/ Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations Man, Yaakob B. Che Abdul Karim, Mohamad N.B. Kun, Tan T. Four different formulations of rice‐soy snack containing 4.5%, 9.0%, 13.5%, and 18.0% full‐fat soy flour (FFSF) were evaluated for their nutritional values and acceptance. Protein content increased from 9.54% to 15.44% and chemical scores of the snacks from 86 to 100 but there was no difference in Net Protein Utilization although values were higher in snacks than in either rice or FFSF alone. All formulations were well accepted but at the highest level of FFSF (18%) acceptability was significantly (P<0.01) reduced. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved 1992 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/1/118786.pdf Man, Yaakob B. Che and Abdul Karim, Mohamad N.B. and Kun, Tan T. (1992) Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 27 (6). pp. 715-719. ISSN 0950-5423; eISSN: 1365-2621 https://academic.oup.com/ijfst/article/27/6/715/7867748 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb01243.x
spellingShingle Man, Yaakob B. Che
Abdul Karim, Mohamad N.B.
Kun, Tan T.
Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations
title Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations
title_full Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations
title_fullStr Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations
title_short Evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations
title_sort evaluation of four high‐protein rice‐soy snack formulations
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118786/1/118786.pdf