Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals

Writing a thesis proposal is an essential part of the doctoral students’ candidacy. The quality of feedback and the rhetorical resources conveyed in such feedback, especially engagement markers, can have a great impact on students’ perception and engagement with feedback. However, doctoral students’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor Danarajan, Sharon Sharmini, Yahya, Muhammad Yasir, Lee, Geok Imm, Ali Hussein, Zina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UK Zhende Publishing Group 2024
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/1/118463.pdf
_version_ 1848867521810137088
author Victor Danarajan, Sharon Sharmini
Yahya, Muhammad Yasir
Lee, Geok Imm
Ali Hussein, Zina
author_facet Victor Danarajan, Sharon Sharmini
Yahya, Muhammad Yasir
Lee, Geok Imm
Ali Hussein, Zina
author_sort Victor Danarajan, Sharon Sharmini
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Writing a thesis proposal is an essential part of the doctoral students’ candidacy. The quality of feedback and the rhetorical resources conveyed in such feedback, especially engagement markers, can have a great impact on students’ perception and engagement with feedback. However, doctoral students’ perceptions towards types of feedback and engagement markers communicated by supervisors and peers on students’ research proposals is thin on the ground. Therefore, this study investigated the types of written feedback and engagement markers EFL and ESL students perceived as useful for their thesis proposal development. A quantitative method in the form of questionnaire was employed with 23 students at University Putra Malaysia. Results indicated that, though EFL and ESL students held quite consistent perceptions toward certain types of feedback and engagement markers, their prior experience, educational and cultural issues, and understandings seemed to shape their different perceptions and affect their receptivity and utilization of feedback. Results from this study offer useful guidelines on how to provide an effective and resourceful feedback to meet EFL and ESL students’ requirements and expectations in higher education.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T14:37:49Z
format Article
id upm-118463
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T14:37:49Z
publishDate 2024
publisher UK Zhende Publishing Group
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1184632025-07-16T02:21:44Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/ Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals Victor Danarajan, Sharon Sharmini Yahya, Muhammad Yasir Lee, Geok Imm Ali Hussein, Zina Writing a thesis proposal is an essential part of the doctoral students’ candidacy. The quality of feedback and the rhetorical resources conveyed in such feedback, especially engagement markers, can have a great impact on students’ perception and engagement with feedback. However, doctoral students’ perceptions towards types of feedback and engagement markers communicated by supervisors and peers on students’ research proposals is thin on the ground. Therefore, this study investigated the types of written feedback and engagement markers EFL and ESL students perceived as useful for their thesis proposal development. A quantitative method in the form of questionnaire was employed with 23 students at University Putra Malaysia. Results indicated that, though EFL and ESL students held quite consistent perceptions toward certain types of feedback and engagement markers, their prior experience, educational and cultural issues, and understandings seemed to shape their different perceptions and affect their receptivity and utilization of feedback. Results from this study offer useful guidelines on how to provide an effective and resourceful feedback to meet EFL and ESL students’ requirements and expectations in higher education. UK Zhende Publishing Group 2024 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/1/118463.pdf Victor Danarajan, Sharon Sharmini and Yahya, Muhammad Yasir and Lee, Geok Imm and Ali Hussein, Zina (2024) Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30 (5). pp. 4334-4345. ISSN 1300-4832; eISSN: 2148-2403 https://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/3632 10.53555/kuey.v30i5.3632
spellingShingle Victor Danarajan, Sharon Sharmini
Yahya, Muhammad Yasir
Lee, Geok Imm
Ali Hussein, Zina
Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals
title Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals
title_full Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals
title_fullStr Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals
title_full_unstemmed Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals
title_short Doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals
title_sort doctoral students’ perceptions of written feedback and engagements markers on thesis proposals
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/118463/1/118463.pdf