Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study

It is paramount to assess the risk of biases in may arise from diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) study as it will affect the accuracy and validity of the tests. These biases can be found in published researches and here we look at COVID-19 DTA studies. The evaluation of bias risk in diagnostic research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mud Shukri, Muhammad Ikhwan, Zainal, Nur Za’Imah, Azman, Ahmad Zaid Fattah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2024
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/1/117072.pdf
_version_ 1848867159404445696
author Mud Shukri, Muhammad Ikhwan
Zainal, Nur Za’Imah
Azman, Ahmad Zaid Fattah
author_facet Mud Shukri, Muhammad Ikhwan
Zainal, Nur Za’Imah
Azman, Ahmad Zaid Fattah
author_sort Mud Shukri, Muhammad Ikhwan
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description It is paramount to assess the risk of biases in may arise from diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) study as it will affect the accuracy and validity of the tests. These biases can be found in published researches and here we look at COVID-19 DTA studies. The evaluation of bias risk in diagnostic research is mainly performed using QUADAS-2. The aim of this review was to determine potential selection and information biases in diagnostic test accuracy studies and strategies to minimize risk of biases. Literature review related to diagnostic test accuracy study is identified through an online search of databases namely PubMed, ScienceDirect, Research Gate, Google Scholar, and official government websites range. Six potential biases in four QUADAS-2 domains are identified in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study which are 1) spectrum bias in patient selection; 2) interpretation bias in index test; 3) differential misclassification bias and nondifferential misclassification bias in reference standard; and 4) partial verification bias and differential verification bias in patient flow. The identified biases exert effects on accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tests. Six strategies are recommended to reduce these biases, hence, improving the accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tests. The best diagnostic test can give benefits to the population in the mass screening program during COVID-19.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T14:32:04Z
format Article
id upm-117072
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T14:32:04Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1170722025-05-30T01:33:16Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/ Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study Mud Shukri, Muhammad Ikhwan Zainal, Nur Za’Imah Azman, Ahmad Zaid Fattah It is paramount to assess the risk of biases in may arise from diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) study as it will affect the accuracy and validity of the tests. These biases can be found in published researches and here we look at COVID-19 DTA studies. The evaluation of bias risk in diagnostic research is mainly performed using QUADAS-2. The aim of this review was to determine potential selection and information biases in diagnostic test accuracy studies and strategies to minimize risk of biases. Literature review related to diagnostic test accuracy study is identified through an online search of databases namely PubMed, ScienceDirect, Research Gate, Google Scholar, and official government websites range. Six potential biases in four QUADAS-2 domains are identified in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study which are 1) spectrum bias in patient selection; 2) interpretation bias in index test; 3) differential misclassification bias and nondifferential misclassification bias in reference standard; and 4) partial verification bias and differential verification bias in patient flow. The identified biases exert effects on accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tests. Six strategies are recommended to reduce these biases, hence, improving the accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tests. The best diagnostic test can give benefits to the population in the mass screening program during COVID-19. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2024-01 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/1/117072.pdf Mud Shukri, Muhammad Ikhwan and Zainal, Nur Za’Imah and Azman, Ahmad Zaid Fattah (2024) Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 20 (1). pp. 359-364. ISSN 1675-8544; eISSN: 2636-9346 https://medic.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/2024012411401542_MJMHS_0290.pdf 10.47836/mjmhs.20.1.43
spellingShingle Mud Shukri, Muhammad Ikhwan
Zainal, Nur Za’Imah
Azman, Ahmad Zaid Fattah
Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study
title Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study
title_full Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study
title_fullStr Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study
title_short Risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in COVID-19 diagnostic test accuracy study
title_sort risk of bias assessment and risk minimisation strategies in covid-19 diagnostic test accuracy study
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/117072/1/117072.pdf