Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil

Evaluation of compound controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) in the soil is essential in order to establish an appropriate soil management and fertilizer application technique. A compound fertilizer containing about 15% nitrogen (N), 2% phosphorus (P), 16% potassium (K), 4% calcium (Ca), 1% magnesium...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanafi, M. M., Eltaib, S. M., Ahmad, M. B., Syed Omar, S. R.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor and Francis Group 2002
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/112990/
_version_ 1848866097563959296
author Hanafi, M. M.
Eltaib, S. M.
Ahmad, M. B.
Syed Omar, S. R.
author_facet Hanafi, M. M.
Eltaib, S. M.
Ahmad, M. B.
Syed Omar, S. R.
author_sort Hanafi, M. M.
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Evaluation of compound controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) in the soil is essential in order to establish an appropriate soil management and fertilizer application technique. A compound fertilizer containing about 15% nitrogen (N), 2% phosphorus (P), 16% potassium (K), 4% calcium (Ca), 1% magnesium (Mg), and 1% copper (Cu) was prepared and subsequently coated with natural rubber (NR), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyacrylamide (PA), and polylactic acid (PLA). Evaluations of the compound CRF were conducted in the laboratory and in the field using an open leaching technique. The soil column was prepared using an acid Bungor soil (Typic Paleudult) packed in PVC tube for the laboratory and an undisturbed soil column for the field studies. A 25-g sample of each coated fertilizer was mixed with the soil in the top (0-60 mm) of the soil column. Nutrients released by the compound CRF in the appropriate soil column were monitored in the leachate for 30 d (about 18.0 pore volume (PV) of leachate), while in the field they were exposed to the atmosphere for about 90 d. The uncoated compound fertilizer gave significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher amount of nutrient loss compared to the coated fertilizers during leaching in the laboratory. The values ranged from 3023.0 mg N (80.3% of that added) to 1.4 mg Cu (6.2% of that added). Among the coated fertilizers, there were wide variations in the amounts and types of nutrient losses between different coating materials. By taking the summation of nutrients in the leachate, the effectiveness of the uncoated and coated compound fertilizers decreased in the order: PVC ≈NR < PLA > PA ⋙ uncoated. Depth distribution of nutrients and their amounts remaining in the soil column of the respective treatments showed no significant difference between leaching in the laboratory and that in the field. Thus, the effectiveness of the compound uncoated and coated fertilizers was similar to that measured in the laboratory using a fraction collector. Therefore, an assessment of the CRF could be done precisely and accurately in the laboratory using an open leaching technique. However, the effectiveness of CRF needs to be validated in the presence of a growing plant.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T14:15:11Z
format Article
id upm-112990
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-15T14:15:11Z
publishDate 2002
publisher Taylor and Francis Group
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1129902025-01-13T01:42:26Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/112990/ Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil Hanafi, M. M. Eltaib, S. M. Ahmad, M. B. Syed Omar, S. R. Evaluation of compound controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) in the soil is essential in order to establish an appropriate soil management and fertilizer application technique. A compound fertilizer containing about 15% nitrogen (N), 2% phosphorus (P), 16% potassium (K), 4% calcium (Ca), 1% magnesium (Mg), and 1% copper (Cu) was prepared and subsequently coated with natural rubber (NR), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyacrylamide (PA), and polylactic acid (PLA). Evaluations of the compound CRF were conducted in the laboratory and in the field using an open leaching technique. The soil column was prepared using an acid Bungor soil (Typic Paleudult) packed in PVC tube for the laboratory and an undisturbed soil column for the field studies. A 25-g sample of each coated fertilizer was mixed with the soil in the top (0-60 mm) of the soil column. Nutrients released by the compound CRF in the appropriate soil column were monitored in the leachate for 30 d (about 18.0 pore volume (PV) of leachate), while in the field they were exposed to the atmosphere for about 90 d. The uncoated compound fertilizer gave significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher amount of nutrient loss compared to the coated fertilizers during leaching in the laboratory. The values ranged from 3023.0 mg N (80.3% of that added) to 1.4 mg Cu (6.2% of that added). Among the coated fertilizers, there were wide variations in the amounts and types of nutrient losses between different coating materials. By taking the summation of nutrients in the leachate, the effectiveness of the uncoated and coated compound fertilizers decreased in the order: PVC ≈NR < PLA > PA ⋙ uncoated. Depth distribution of nutrients and their amounts remaining in the soil column of the respective treatments showed no significant difference between leaching in the laboratory and that in the field. Thus, the effectiveness of the compound uncoated and coated fertilizers was similar to that measured in the laboratory using a fraction collector. Therefore, an assessment of the CRF could be done precisely and accurately in the laboratory using an open leaching technique. However, the effectiveness of CRF needs to be validated in the presence of a growing plant. Taylor and Francis Group 2002 Article PeerReviewed Hanafi, M. M. and Eltaib, S. M. and Ahmad, M. B. and Syed Omar, S. R. (2002) Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 33 (7-8). pp. 1139-1156. ISSN 0010-3624; eISSN: 1532-2416 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1081/CSS-120003878 10.1081/css-120003878
spellingShingle Hanafi, M. M.
Eltaib, S. M.
Ahmad, M. B.
Syed Omar, S. R.
Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil
title Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil
title_full Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil
title_fullStr Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil
title_short Evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil
title_sort evaluation of controlled-release compound fertilizers in soil
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/112990/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/112990/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/112990/