Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Three electrodes—E1 (0.18 mg Pt cm−2), E2 (0.38 mg Pt cm−2), E3 (0.4 mg Pt cm−2 without a gas-diffusion layer)—are fabricated and compared with a commercial product (E-TEK). The performance of the electrodes increases with increase in Pt loading in the catalyst layer. The performance of the E2 elect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iyuke, Sunny E., Mohamad, Abu Bakar, Kadhum, Abdul Amir H., Daud, Wan R.W., Rachid, Chebbi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2003
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/3/111732.pdf
_version_ 1848865766248546304
author Iyuke, Sunny E.
Mohamad, Abu Bakar
Kadhum, Abdul Amir H.
Daud, Wan R.W.
Rachid, Chebbi
author_facet Iyuke, Sunny E.
Mohamad, Abu Bakar
Kadhum, Abdul Amir H.
Daud, Wan R.W.
Rachid, Chebbi
author_sort Iyuke, Sunny E.
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Three electrodes—E1 (0.18 mg Pt cm−2), E2 (0.38 mg Pt cm−2), E3 (0.4 mg Pt cm−2 without a gas-diffusion layer)—are fabricated and compared with a commercial product (E-TEK). The performance of the electrodes increases with increase in Pt loading in the catalyst layer. The performance of the E2 electrode is superior to that of E1, E-TEK or E3. Elimination of the diffusion layer between the carbon-cloth substrate and the catalyst layer affects the performance of electrode E3 in particular. The power density shows a similar pattern to current density. The difference in performance between E2 and E-TEK electrodes may be due to the difference in the method of fabrication. Increase in exchange current density results in an increase in efficiency. The curves for E1, E2 and E-TEK electrodes appear to stabilize at constant efficiency, which indicates maximum efficiency at a lower exchange current density, compared with the E2 electrode, which does not approach a steady efficiency even at an exchange current density of 1 mA cm−2. This means that the E2 electrode has greater efficiency than E1, E3 or E-TEK electrodes. Voltage and irreversibility curves for the four electrodes meet at different voltage operational limits; namely, 0.48, 0.55, 0.46 and 0.42 V at 1.2, 0.85, 0.4 and 0.3 mA cm−2, for E-TEK, E2, E1 and E3 electrodes, respectively. Hence, while these electrodes can be operated conveniently, the E2 electrode with a 0.38 mg Pt cm−2 loading can be operated at optimum conditions of 0.55 V and 0.85 mA cm−2.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T14:09:55Z
format Article
id upm-111732
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T14:09:55Z
publishDate 2003
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1117322025-03-12T08:19:53Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/ Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells Iyuke, Sunny E. Mohamad, Abu Bakar Kadhum, Abdul Amir H. Daud, Wan R.W. Rachid, Chebbi Three electrodes—E1 (0.18 mg Pt cm−2), E2 (0.38 mg Pt cm−2), E3 (0.4 mg Pt cm−2 without a gas-diffusion layer)—are fabricated and compared with a commercial product (E-TEK). The performance of the electrodes increases with increase in Pt loading in the catalyst layer. The performance of the E2 electrode is superior to that of E1, E-TEK or E3. Elimination of the diffusion layer between the carbon-cloth substrate and the catalyst layer affects the performance of electrode E3 in particular. The power density shows a similar pattern to current density. The difference in performance between E2 and E-TEK electrodes may be due to the difference in the method of fabrication. Increase in exchange current density results in an increase in efficiency. The curves for E1, E2 and E-TEK electrodes appear to stabilize at constant efficiency, which indicates maximum efficiency at a lower exchange current density, compared with the E2 electrode, which does not approach a steady efficiency even at an exchange current density of 1 mA cm−2. This means that the E2 electrode has greater efficiency than E1, E3 or E-TEK electrodes. Voltage and irreversibility curves for the four electrodes meet at different voltage operational limits; namely, 0.48, 0.55, 0.46 and 0.42 V at 1.2, 0.85, 0.4 and 0.3 mA cm−2, for E-TEK, E2, E1 and E3 electrodes, respectively. Hence, while these electrodes can be operated conveniently, the E2 electrode with a 0.38 mg Pt cm−2 loading can be operated at optimum conditions of 0.55 V and 0.85 mA cm−2. Elsevier 2003 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/3/111732.pdf Iyuke, Sunny E. and Mohamad, Abu Bakar and Kadhum, Abdul Amir H. and Daud, Wan R.W. and Rachid, Chebbi (2003) Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 114 (2). pp. 195-202. ISSN 0378-7753; eISSN: 1873-2755 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378775303000168 10.1016/s0378-7753(03)00016-8
spellingShingle Iyuke, Sunny E.
Mohamad, Abu Bakar
Kadhum, Abdul Amir H.
Daud, Wan R.W.
Rachid, Chebbi
Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
title Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
title_full Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
title_fullStr Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
title_full_unstemmed Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
title_short Improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
title_sort improved membrane and electrode assemblies for proton exchange membrane fuel cells
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/111732/3/111732.pdf