Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

Background: Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods: The inte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Su-Min Hu, F., Amin-Tai, H., Jabar, M. F., Abdul Satar, M. H. S., Fathi, N. Q., Rao, P. S.
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press 2023
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107769/
_version_ 1848864985215664128
author Su-Min Hu, F.
Amin-Tai, H.
Jabar, M. F.
Jabar, M. F.
Abdul Satar, M. H. S.
Fathi, N. Q.
Rao, P. S.
author_facet Su-Min Hu, F.
Amin-Tai, H.
Jabar, M. F.
Jabar, M. F.
Abdul Satar, M. H. S.
Fathi, N. Q.
Rao, P. S.
author_sort Su-Min Hu, F.
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods: The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results: A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion: Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
first_indexed 2025-11-15T13:57:30Z
format Article
id upm-107769
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-15T13:57:30Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1077692024-10-30T02:20:09Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107769/ Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries Su-Min Hu, F. Amin-Tai, H. Jabar, M. F. Jabar, M. F. Abdul Satar, M. H. S. Fathi, N. Q. Rao, P. S. Background: Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods: The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results: A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion: Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Oxford University Press 2023-11-29 Article PeerReviewed Su-Min Hu, F. and Amin-Tai, H. and Jabar, M. F. and Jabar, M. F. and Abdul Satar, M. H. S. and Fathi, N. Q. and Rao, P. S. (2023) Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries. British Journal of Surgery, 111 (1). pp. 1-12. ISSN 0007-1323; eISSN: 1365-2168 https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/111/1/znad370/7455707 10.1093/bjs/znad370
spellingShingle Su-Min Hu, F.
Amin-Tai, H.
Jabar, M. F.
Jabar, M. F.
Abdul Satar, M. H. S.
Fathi, N. Q.
Rao, P. S.
Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
title Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
title_full Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
title_fullStr Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
title_short Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
title_sort evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (eagle): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107769/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107769/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107769/