Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China

Automated writing evaluation (AWE) program has huge potential to facilitate English writing instruction and EFL learners’ learning. As one of the most massively implemented AWE programs in China, the Pigai program has gained increasing ground in English writing instruction. However, a paucity of res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Geng, Jingxin, Razali, Abu Bakar, Ismail, Lilliati, Noordin, Nooreen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media B.V. 2024
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/1/106250.pdf
_version_ 1848864726994386944
author Geng, Jingxin
Razali, Abu Bakar
Ismail, Lilliati
Noordin, Nooreen
author_facet Geng, Jingxin
Razali, Abu Bakar
Ismail, Lilliati
Noordin, Nooreen
author_sort Geng, Jingxin
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Automated writing evaluation (AWE) program has huge potential to facilitate English writing instruction and EFL learners’ learning. As one of the most massively implemented AWE programs in China, the Pigai program has gained increasing ground in English writing instruction. However, a paucity of research limits to addressing its effects as an assisted teaching tool. Therefore, this study was conducted to ascertain the effect of the AWE-Pigai assisted process-based approach in improving Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing performance and their error correction ability. As such, three intact classes from the first year in English major at a university in China were recruited. They received three different teaching approaches respectively: the Process-based writing approach (PBWA), the combined use of the Pigai program and the PBWA (Pigai + PBWA), and the conventional teaching approach. After a 14-week training program and a month after the intervention, students’ writing performance at three different time slots were compared, i.e., pre-, post-, and post-delayed tests. Results indicated that the Pigai + PBWA was able to outperform the other two methods in improving students’ writing performance and displayed a better post-delay effect in internalizing students’ writing knowledge in their long-term memory. Finally, the pedagogical implications of this study were also discussed. © 2024, Education Research Institute, Seoul National University.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T13:53:24Z
format Article
id upm-106250
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T13:53:24Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1062502024-08-15T01:52:28Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/ Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China Geng, Jingxin Razali, Abu Bakar Ismail, Lilliati Noordin, Nooreen Automated writing evaluation (AWE) program has huge potential to facilitate English writing instruction and EFL learners’ learning. As one of the most massively implemented AWE programs in China, the Pigai program has gained increasing ground in English writing instruction. However, a paucity of research limits to addressing its effects as an assisted teaching tool. Therefore, this study was conducted to ascertain the effect of the AWE-Pigai assisted process-based approach in improving Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing performance and their error correction ability. As such, three intact classes from the first year in English major at a university in China were recruited. They received three different teaching approaches respectively: the Process-based writing approach (PBWA), the combined use of the Pigai program and the PBWA (Pigai + PBWA), and the conventional teaching approach. After a 14-week training program and a month after the intervention, students’ writing performance at three different time slots were compared, i.e., pre-, post-, and post-delayed tests. Results indicated that the Pigai + PBWA was able to outperform the other two methods in improving students’ writing performance and displayed a better post-delay effect in internalizing students’ writing knowledge in their long-term memory. Finally, the pedagogical implications of this study were also discussed. © 2024, Education Research Institute, Seoul National University. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. 2024-02 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/1/106250.pdf Geng, Jingxin and Razali, Abu Bakar and Ismail, Lilliati and Noordin, Nooreen (2024) Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China. Asia Pacific Education Review. pp. 1-16. ISSN 1598-1037; ESSN: 1876-407X (In Press) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-023-09922-5 10.1007/s12564-023-09922-5
spellingShingle Geng, Jingxin
Razali, Abu Bakar
Ismail, Lilliati
Noordin, Nooreen
Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China
title Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China
title_full Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China
title_fullStr Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China
title_short Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing performance in China
title_sort effectiveness of automated writing evaluation program to enhance efl undergraduates’ writing performance in china
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106250/1/106250.pdf