Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images
Feature extraction in Copy-Move Forgery Detection (CMFD) is crucial to facilitate image forgery analysis. Edge detection is one of the processes to extract specific information from Copy-Move Forgery (CMF) Images. It sensitizes the amount of information in the image and filters out useless ones whil...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
The Science and Information Organization
2022
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100755/ |
| _version_ | 1848863405744586752 |
|---|---|
| author | Idris, Bashir Abdullah, Lili N. Abdul Halim, Alfian Abdullah Selimun, Mohd Taufik |
| author_facet | Idris, Bashir Abdullah, Lili N. Abdul Halim, Alfian Abdullah Selimun, Mohd Taufik |
| author_sort | Idris, Bashir |
| building | UPM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Feature extraction in Copy-Move Forgery Detection (CMFD) is crucial to facilitate image forgery analysis. Edge detection is one of the processes to extract specific information from Copy-Move Forgery (CMF) Images. It sensitizes the amount of information in the image and filters out useless ones while preserving the important structural properties in the image. This paper compares five edge detection methods: Robert, Sobel, Prewitt (first Derivative), Laplacian, and Canny edge detectors (second Derivatives). CMFD evaluation datasets images (MICC-F220) are tested with both methods to facilitate comparison. The edge detection operators were implemented with their respective convolution masks. Robert with a 2x2 mask, The Prewitt and Sobel with a 3x3 mask, while Laplacian and canny used adjustable masks. These masks determine the quality of the detected edges. Edges reflect a great-intensity contrast that is either darker or brighter. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T13:32:24Z |
| format | Article |
| id | upm-100755 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T13:32:24Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | The Science and Information Organization |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | upm-1007552023-09-08T01:38:25Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100755/ Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images Idris, Bashir Abdullah, Lili N. Abdul Halim, Alfian Abdullah Selimun, Mohd Taufik Feature extraction in Copy-Move Forgery Detection (CMFD) is crucial to facilitate image forgery analysis. Edge detection is one of the processes to extract specific information from Copy-Move Forgery (CMF) Images. It sensitizes the amount of information in the image and filters out useless ones while preserving the important structural properties in the image. This paper compares five edge detection methods: Robert, Sobel, Prewitt (first Derivative), Laplacian, and Canny edge detectors (second Derivatives). CMFD evaluation datasets images (MICC-F220) are tested with both methods to facilitate comparison. The edge detection operators were implemented with their respective convolution masks. Robert with a 2x2 mask, The Prewitt and Sobel with a 3x3 mask, while Laplacian and canny used adjustable masks. These masks determine the quality of the detected edges. Edges reflect a great-intensity contrast that is either darker or brighter. The Science and Information Organization 2022-10 Article PeerReviewed Idris, Bashir and Abdullah, Lili N. and Abdul Halim, Alfian and Abdullah Selimun, Mohd Taufik (2022) Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 13 (10). art. no. 21. 152 - 160. ISSN 2158-107X; ESSN: 2156-5570 https://thesai.org/Publications/ViewIssue?volume=13&issue=10&code=IJACSA |
| spellingShingle | Idris, Bashir Abdullah, Lili N. Abdul Halim, Alfian Abdullah Selimun, Mohd Taufik Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images |
| title | Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images |
| title_full | Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images |
| title_short | Comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images |
| title_sort | comparison of edge detection algorithms for texture analysis on copy-move forgery detection images |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100755/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100755/ |