Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats

Background: The selection of appropriate scaffold plays an important role in ensuring the success of bone regeneration. The use of scaffolds with different materials and their effect on the osteogenic performance of cells is not well studied and this can affect the selection of suitable scaffolds fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luchman, Nur Atmaliya, Megat Abdul Wahab, Rohaya, Zainal Ariffin, Shahrul Hisham, Nasruddin, Nurrul Shaqinah, Seng, Fong Lau, Yazid, Farinawati
Format: Article
Published: PeerJ 2022
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100753/
_version_ 1848863405181501440
author Luchman, Nur Atmaliya
Megat Abdul Wahab, Rohaya
Zainal Ariffin, Shahrul Hisham
Nasruddin, Nurrul Shaqinah
Seng, Fong Lau
Yazid, Farinawati
author_facet Luchman, Nur Atmaliya
Megat Abdul Wahab, Rohaya
Zainal Ariffin, Shahrul Hisham
Nasruddin, Nurrul Shaqinah
Seng, Fong Lau
Yazid, Farinawati
author_sort Luchman, Nur Atmaliya
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: The selection of appropriate scaffold plays an important role in ensuring the success of bone regeneration. The use of scaffolds with different materials and their effect on the osteogenic performance of cells is not well studied and this can affect the selection of suitable scaffolds for transplantation. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the comparative ability of two different synthetic scaffolds, mainly hydroxyapatite (HA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds in promoting in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration. Method: In vitro cell viability, morphology, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of MC3T3-E1 cells on HA and PCL scaffolds were determined in comparison to the accepted model outlined for two-dimensional systems. An in vivo study involving the transplantation of MC3T3-E1 cells with scaffolds into an artificial bone defect of 4 mm length and 1.5 mm depth in the rat’s left maxilla was conducted. Three-dimensional analysis using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and immunohistochemistry analyses evaluation were performed after six weeks of transplantation. Results: MC3T3-E1 cells on the HA scaffold showed the highest cell viability. The cell viability on both scaffolds decreased after 14 days of culture, which reflects the dominant occurrence of osteoblast differentiation. An early sign of osteoblast differentiation can be detected on the PCL scaffold. However, cells on the HA scaffold showed more prominent results with intense mineralized nodules and significantly (p < 0.05) high levels of ALP activity with prolonged osteoblast induction. Micro-CT and H&E analyses confirmed the in vitro results with bone formation were significantly (p < 0.05) greater in HA scaffold and was supported by IHC analysis which confirmed stronger expression of osteogenic markers ALP and osteocalcin. Conclusion: Different scaffold materials of HA and PCL might have influenced the bone regeneration ability of MC3T3-E1. Regardless, in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration was better in the HA scaffold which indicates its great potential for application in bone regeneration.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T13:32:24Z
format Article
id upm-100753
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-15T13:32:24Z
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1007532023-08-29T02:07:49Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100753/ Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats Luchman, Nur Atmaliya Megat Abdul Wahab, Rohaya Zainal Ariffin, Shahrul Hisham Nasruddin, Nurrul Shaqinah Seng, Fong Lau Yazid, Farinawati Background: The selection of appropriate scaffold plays an important role in ensuring the success of bone regeneration. The use of scaffolds with different materials and their effect on the osteogenic performance of cells is not well studied and this can affect the selection of suitable scaffolds for transplantation. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the comparative ability of two different synthetic scaffolds, mainly hydroxyapatite (HA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds in promoting in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration. Method: In vitro cell viability, morphology, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of MC3T3-E1 cells on HA and PCL scaffolds were determined in comparison to the accepted model outlined for two-dimensional systems. An in vivo study involving the transplantation of MC3T3-E1 cells with scaffolds into an artificial bone defect of 4 mm length and 1.5 mm depth in the rat’s left maxilla was conducted. Three-dimensional analysis using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and immunohistochemistry analyses evaluation were performed after six weeks of transplantation. Results: MC3T3-E1 cells on the HA scaffold showed the highest cell viability. The cell viability on both scaffolds decreased after 14 days of culture, which reflects the dominant occurrence of osteoblast differentiation. An early sign of osteoblast differentiation can be detected on the PCL scaffold. However, cells on the HA scaffold showed more prominent results with intense mineralized nodules and significantly (p < 0.05) high levels of ALP activity with prolonged osteoblast induction. Micro-CT and H&E analyses confirmed the in vitro results with bone formation were significantly (p < 0.05) greater in HA scaffold and was supported by IHC analysis which confirmed stronger expression of osteogenic markers ALP and osteocalcin. Conclusion: Different scaffold materials of HA and PCL might have influenced the bone regeneration ability of MC3T3-E1. Regardless, in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration was better in the HA scaffold which indicates its great potential for application in bone regeneration. PeerJ 2022-05-02 Article PeerReviewed Luchman, Nur Atmaliya and Megat Abdul Wahab, Rohaya and Zainal Ariffin, Shahrul Hisham and Nasruddin, Nurrul Shaqinah and Seng, Fong Lau and Yazid, Farinawati (2022) Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats. PeerJ, 10. art. no. e13356. pp. 1-29. ISSN 2167-8359 https://peerj.com/articles/13356/ 10.7717/peerj.13356
spellingShingle Luchman, Nur Atmaliya
Megat Abdul Wahab, Rohaya
Zainal Ariffin, Shahrul Hisham
Nasruddin, Nurrul Shaqinah
Seng, Fong Lau
Yazid, Farinawati
Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats
title Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats
title_full Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats
title_fullStr Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats
title_short Comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats
title_sort comparison between hydroxyapatite and polycaprolactone in inducing osteogenic differentiation and augmenting maxillary bone regeneration in rats
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100753/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100753/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100753/