A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches

Tremendous efforts have been made to improve the bonding characteristics between rubber particles and the cement matrix using surface treatment of the rubber. This study is designed experimentally to explore the significance of rubber surface treatment by chemical and non-chemical approaches. The fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M.N., Noor Azline, A.B., Nabilah, S., Nor Azizi, A.A., Farah Nora Aznieta
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2022
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100089/
_version_ 1848863220893220864
author M.N., Noor Azline
A.B., Nabilah
S., Nor Azizi
A.A., Farah Nora Aznieta
author_facet M.N., Noor Azline
A.B., Nabilah
S., Nor Azizi
A.A., Farah Nora Aznieta
author_sort M.N., Noor Azline
building UPM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Tremendous efforts have been made to improve the bonding characteristics between rubber particles and the cement matrix using surface treatment of the rubber. This study is designed experimentally to explore the significance of rubber surface treatment by chemical and non-chemical approaches. The finding is also expected to evaluate the significance of the combining methods in improving the rubberized concrete’s behavior and aims to evaluate the sustainable aspect of promoting the rubberized concrete for practical application in industry. A total of 10% of treated rubber and 15% of metakaolin were used to replace fine aggregate and cement, respectively. Two surface treatment methods were applied, namely (1) a non-chemical approach by water soaking treatment with cement coating and (2) a chemical approach using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution soaking treatment. A comparable compressive strength was observed due to the improvement of the interfacial gap in the rubberized concrete. Results show that the compressive strength of rubber with water-cement coated (WCC) and NaOH treatments (NaOH) is 44.4 N/mm2 and 46.4 N/mm2, respectively. The study found that there was no significant difference in the mechanical strength of rubberized concrete using the two surface treatment methods. A similar behavior was also observed in the energy absorption capability of rubberized concrete, where the surface treatments did not significantly affect the property of treated rubberized concrete. Overall, the finding suggests that the combining method between rubber surface treatment and cement blended enhances the properties of rubberized concrete and has potential for concrete structural elements. Furthermore, the environmental assessment revealed a significant reduction in the embodied CO2 of rubberized concrete compared to 100%OPC concrete. However, the cost for rubberized concrete production was slightly higher than for non-rubberized concrete. Nevertheless, it was found that the surface treatment methods were easy and practical for application in the construction industry.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T13:29:28Z
format Article
id upm-100089
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-15T13:29:28Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling upm-1000892024-08-05T01:37:00Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100089/ A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches M.N., Noor Azline A.B., Nabilah S., Nor Azizi A.A., Farah Nora Aznieta Tremendous efforts have been made to improve the bonding characteristics between rubber particles and the cement matrix using surface treatment of the rubber. This study is designed experimentally to explore the significance of rubber surface treatment by chemical and non-chemical approaches. The finding is also expected to evaluate the significance of the combining methods in improving the rubberized concrete’s behavior and aims to evaluate the sustainable aspect of promoting the rubberized concrete for practical application in industry. A total of 10% of treated rubber and 15% of metakaolin were used to replace fine aggregate and cement, respectively. Two surface treatment methods were applied, namely (1) a non-chemical approach by water soaking treatment with cement coating and (2) a chemical approach using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution soaking treatment. A comparable compressive strength was observed due to the improvement of the interfacial gap in the rubberized concrete. Results show that the compressive strength of rubber with water-cement coated (WCC) and NaOH treatments (NaOH) is 44.4 N/mm2 and 46.4 N/mm2, respectively. The study found that there was no significant difference in the mechanical strength of rubberized concrete using the two surface treatment methods. A similar behavior was also observed in the energy absorption capability of rubberized concrete, where the surface treatments did not significantly affect the property of treated rubberized concrete. Overall, the finding suggests that the combining method between rubber surface treatment and cement blended enhances the properties of rubberized concrete and has potential for concrete structural elements. Furthermore, the environmental assessment revealed a significant reduction in the embodied CO2 of rubberized concrete compared to 100%OPC concrete. However, the cost for rubberized concrete production was slightly higher than for non-rubberized concrete. Nevertheless, it was found that the surface treatment methods were easy and practical for application in the construction industry. Elsevier 2022-12 Article PeerReviewed M.N., Noor Azline and A.B., Nabilah and S., Nor Azizi and A.A., Farah Nora Aznieta (2022) A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17. art. no. e01444. pp. 1-13. ISSN 2214-5095 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509522005769?via%3Dihub 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01444
spellingShingle M.N., Noor Azline
A.B., Nabilah
S., Nor Azizi
A.A., Farah Nora Aznieta
A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches
title A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches
title_full A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches
title_fullStr A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches
title_full_unstemmed A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches
title_short A comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches
title_sort comparative investigation on mechanical strength of blended concrete with surface modified rubber by chemical and non-chemical approaches
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100089/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100089/
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/100089/