Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry
Both Litigation and Arbitration are traditional dispute resolution methods available in our construction industry. Parties in dispute are allowed to opt for litigation as means of dispute resolution unless there is consent and agreement between the parties...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Year Project Report / IMRAD |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, UNIMAS
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/ http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/8/Dorothy%20Chai%20sin%20Yee%2024pgs.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/9/Dorothy%20Chai%20sin%20Yee.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848836001449902080 |
|---|---|
| author | Dorothy, Chai Sin Yee |
| author_facet | Dorothy, Chai Sin Yee |
| author_sort | Dorothy, Chai Sin Yee |
| building | UNIMAS Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Both Litigation and Arbitration are traditional dispute resolution methods available in our construction industry. Parties in dispute are allowed to opt for litigation as means of dispute resolution unless there is consent and agreement
between the parties to resolve their disputes by arbitration. This study will compare both the methods in term of their similarities and differences of their rules and procedures and to draw out their advantages and disadvantages of each method. This
study then seeks to determine the suitability and the effectiveness of each method in resolving engineering and construction cases. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T06:16:49Z |
| format | Final Year Project Report / IMRAD |
| id | unimas-6844 |
| institution | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T06:16:49Z |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publisher | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, UNIMAS |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | unimas-68442023-07-10T08:58:29Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/ Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry Dorothy, Chai Sin Yee TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Both Litigation and Arbitration are traditional dispute resolution methods available in our construction industry. Parties in dispute are allowed to opt for litigation as means of dispute resolution unless there is consent and agreement between the parties to resolve their disputes by arbitration. This study will compare both the methods in term of their similarities and differences of their rules and procedures and to draw out their advantages and disadvantages of each method. This study then seeks to determine the suitability and the effectiveness of each method in resolving engineering and construction cases. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, UNIMAS 2005 Final Year Project Report / IMRAD NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/8/Dorothy%20Chai%20sin%20Yee%2024pgs.pdf text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/9/Dorothy%20Chai%20sin%20Yee.pdf Dorothy, Chai Sin Yee (2005) Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry. [Final Year Project Report / IMRAD] (Unpublished) |
| spellingShingle | TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Dorothy, Chai Sin Yee Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry |
| title | Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry |
| title_full | Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry |
| title_fullStr | Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry |
| title_short | Dispute resolution methods in the construction industry |
| title_sort | dispute resolution methods in the construction industry |
| topic | TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
| url | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/ http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/8/Dorothy%20Chai%20sin%20Yee%2024pgs.pdf http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/6844/9/Dorothy%20Chai%20sin%20Yee.pdf |