A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design

The European Standards and British Standards are the standards used in design of structural steel. This project is about the comparisons between the two standards with respect to a flexural member design. There are few methods of comparison used int his project. These methods include notation, load...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Franky, Ajie
Format: Final Year Project Report / IMRAD
Language:English
Published: University Malaysia Sarawak, (UNIMAS) 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/2769/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/2769/1/Franky.pdf
_version_ 1848835065359892480
author Franky, Ajie
author_facet Franky, Ajie
author_sort Franky, Ajie
building UNIMAS Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The European Standards and British Standards are the standards used in design of structural steel. This project is about the comparisons between the two standards with respect to a flexural member design. There are few methods of comparison used int his project. These methods include notation, load factors, load combinations and design considerations, an example of flexural member design, the safety factors, economical factors, advantages and disadvantages of these two standards.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T06:01:57Z
format Final Year Project Report / IMRAD
id unimas-2769
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T06:01:57Z
publishDate 2006
publisher University Malaysia Sarawak, (UNIMAS)
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling unimas-27692023-08-28T03:07:38Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/2769/ A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design Franky, Ajie TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The European Standards and British Standards are the standards used in design of structural steel. This project is about the comparisons between the two standards with respect to a flexural member design. There are few methods of comparison used int his project. These methods include notation, load factors, load combinations and design considerations, an example of flexural member design, the safety factors, economical factors, advantages and disadvantages of these two standards. University Malaysia Sarawak, (UNIMAS) 2006 Final Year Project Report / IMRAD NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/2769/1/Franky.pdf Franky, Ajie (2006) A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design. [Final Year Project Report / IMRAD] (Unpublished)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Franky, Ajie
A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design
title A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design
title_full A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design
title_fullStr A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design
title_short A comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and British standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design
title_sort comparison between eurocode 3 (1992) and british standard 5950 (2000) for flexural member design
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/2769/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/2769/1/Franky.pdf