Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care

Partial filial cannibalism, the act of cannibalizing some offspring, has been explained as a response to the high energetic cost of care. I tested this hypothesis by manipulating the cost-to-benefit ratio of care in the scissortail sergeant, Abudefduf sexfasciatus, a tropical damselfish with male...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manica, Andrea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/1/Parental%20fish%20change%20their%20cannibalistic%20behaviour%20in%20response%20%28abstract%29.pdf
_version_ 1848838321932861440
author Manica, Andrea
author_facet Manica, Andrea
author_sort Manica, Andrea
building UNIMAS Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Partial filial cannibalism, the act of cannibalizing some offspring, has been explained as a response to the high energetic cost of care. I tested this hypothesis by manipulating the cost-to-benefit ratio of care in the scissortail sergeant, Abudefduf sexfasciatus, a tropical damselfish with male care. Background egg mortality was lower than the incidence of cannibalism, confirming that males did not just dispose of dead eggs. Investment in the current brood affected future investment, because males forced to skip a brood cycle put more effort into courtship during the following cycle and obtained larger broods than did unmanipulated males. Any factor influencing the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care should also affect the incidence of cannibalism. I reduced the cost of care by supplementary feeding and reduced the benefit of care by simulating a decrease in paternity certainty through simulated intrusions by non-nesting males. Supplementary feeding significantly reduced partial filial cannibalism by parental males, a result compatible with the hypothesis that eggs are consumed to cover the energetic costs of parental care. Cannibalism decreased regardless of whether males were fed with conspecific eggs or crabmeat. Cannibalism was only reduced but not fully eliminated by supplementary feeding, and residual levels of cannibalism after feeding were similar to the background rate of egg mortality. Simulated intrusions by non-nesting males led to an increase in filial cannibalism and a decrease in parental effort.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T06:53:42Z
format Article
id unimas-17593
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T06:53:42Z
publishDate 2004
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling unimas-175932017-09-14T07:46:00Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/ Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care Manica, Andrea SH Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling Partial filial cannibalism, the act of cannibalizing some offspring, has been explained as a response to the high energetic cost of care. I tested this hypothesis by manipulating the cost-to-benefit ratio of care in the scissortail sergeant, Abudefduf sexfasciatus, a tropical damselfish with male care. Background egg mortality was lower than the incidence of cannibalism, confirming that males did not just dispose of dead eggs. Investment in the current brood affected future investment, because males forced to skip a brood cycle put more effort into courtship during the following cycle and obtained larger broods than did unmanipulated males. Any factor influencing the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care should also affect the incidence of cannibalism. I reduced the cost of care by supplementary feeding and reduced the benefit of care by simulating a decrease in paternity certainty through simulated intrusions by non-nesting males. Supplementary feeding significantly reduced partial filial cannibalism by parental males, a result compatible with the hypothesis that eggs are consumed to cover the energetic costs of parental care. Cannibalism decreased regardless of whether males were fed with conspecific eggs or crabmeat. Cannibalism was only reduced but not fully eliminated by supplementary feeding, and residual levels of cannibalism after feeding were similar to the background rate of egg mortality. Simulated intrusions by non-nesting males led to an increase in filial cannibalism and a decrease in parental effort. Elsevier Ltd. 2004 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/1/Parental%20fish%20change%20their%20cannibalistic%20behaviour%20in%20response%20%28abstract%29.pdf Manica, Andrea (2004) Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care. Animal Behaviour, 67 (6). pp. 1015-1021. ISSN 0003-3472 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347204000533#! doi : 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.09.011
spellingShingle SH Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
Manica, Andrea
Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
title Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
title_full Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
title_fullStr Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
title_full_unstemmed Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
title_short Parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
title_sort parental fish change their cannibalistic behaviour in response to the cost-to-benefit ratio of parental care
topic SH Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/17593/1/Parental%20fish%20change%20their%20cannibalistic%20behaviour%20in%20response%20%28abstract%29.pdf