A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia

Dolphin-watching tourism is growing globally. In developing countries, the typically low environmental awareness of operators and poorly enforced or non-existent regulations exacerbate risks to wildlife. Ecological indicators like behavioural responses are useful to assess wildlife tourism, but...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustika, Putu Liza Kusuma, Welters, Riccardo, Ryan, Gerard Edward, D'Lima, Coralie, Sorongon-Yap, Patricia, Jutapruet, Suwat, Peter, Cindy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/7/A%20rapid%20assessment%20of%20wildlife%20tourism%20risk%20posed%20to%20cetaceans%20%28abstract%29.pdf
_version_ 1848837831958462464
author Mustika, Putu Liza Kusuma
Welters, Riccardo
Ryan, Gerard Edward
D'Lima, Coralie
Sorongon-Yap, Patricia
Jutapruet, Suwat
Peter, Cindy
author_facet Mustika, Putu Liza Kusuma
Welters, Riccardo
Ryan, Gerard Edward
D'Lima, Coralie
Sorongon-Yap, Patricia
Jutapruet, Suwat
Peter, Cindy
author_sort Mustika, Putu Liza Kusuma
building UNIMAS Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Dolphin-watching tourism is growing globally. In developing countries, the typically low environmental awareness of operators and poorly enforced or non-existent regulations exacerbate risks to wildlife. Ecological indicators like behavioural responses are useful to assess wildlife tourism, but obtaining such data is slow and expensive. We modified the Driver– Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework to rapidly assess the risk of dolphin-watching tourism harming, displacing or causing local extinction to dolphin populations, using human dimension data to complement limited ecological data. We assessed industries at seven dolphin-watching sites in six countries in Asia: Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. All sites have reached or almost reached financial saturation except Cambodia and Malaysia. We find high risk to dolphins at the sites in India and Indonesia and intermediate risk at the site in Cambodia. Pending more ecological data, the risk at Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysian sites might be low. Our analysis also indicates site-specific conservation recommendations for Driver, Pressure and Response. We suggest that the DPSIR framework is useful to assess the risk of a wildlife watching industry, even when the impact is uncertain due to insufficient ecological data.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T06:45:55Z
format Article
id unimas-15329
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T06:45:55Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling unimas-153292017-02-16T07:55:48Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/ A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia Mustika, Putu Liza Kusuma Welters, Riccardo Ryan, Gerard Edward D'Lima, Coralie Sorongon-Yap, Patricia Jutapruet, Suwat Peter, Cindy GE Environmental Sciences Dolphin-watching tourism is growing globally. In developing countries, the typically low environmental awareness of operators and poorly enforced or non-existent regulations exacerbate risks to wildlife. Ecological indicators like behavioural responses are useful to assess wildlife tourism, but obtaining such data is slow and expensive. We modified the Driver– Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework to rapidly assess the risk of dolphin-watching tourism harming, displacing or causing local extinction to dolphin populations, using human dimension data to complement limited ecological data. We assessed industries at seven dolphin-watching sites in six countries in Asia: Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. All sites have reached or almost reached financial saturation except Cambodia and Malaysia. We find high risk to dolphins at the sites in India and Indonesia and intermediate risk at the site in Cambodia. Pending more ecological data, the risk at Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysian sites might be low. Our analysis also indicates site-specific conservation recommendations for Driver, Pressure and Response. We suggest that the DPSIR framework is useful to assess the risk of a wildlife watching industry, even when the impact is uncertain due to insufficient ecological data. Routledge 2016-12-01 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/7/A%20rapid%20assessment%20of%20wildlife%20tourism%20risk%20posed%20to%20cetaceans%20%28abstract%29.pdf Mustika, Putu Liza Kusuma and Welters, Riccardo and Ryan, Gerard Edward and D'Lima, Coralie and Sorongon-Yap, Patricia and Jutapruet, Suwat and Peter, Cindy (2016) A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. pp. 1-21. ISSN 09669582 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85006107037&doi=10.1080%2f09669582.2016.1257012&partnerID=40&md5=ccb3aca3c9646a6682b3bac7cc6ab4b8 DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1257012
spellingShingle GE Environmental Sciences
Mustika, Putu Liza Kusuma
Welters, Riccardo
Ryan, Gerard Edward
D'Lima, Coralie
Sorongon-Yap, Patricia
Jutapruet, Suwat
Peter, Cindy
A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia
title A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia
title_full A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia
title_fullStr A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia
title_full_unstemmed A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia
title_short A rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in Asia
title_sort rapid assessment of wildlife tourism risk posed to cetaceans in asia
topic GE Environmental Sciences
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/15329/7/A%20rapid%20assessment%20of%20wildlife%20tourism%20risk%20posed%20to%20cetaceans%20%28abstract%29.pdf