Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples

Prompt gamma-ray analysis (PGA) and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) are essential for the study of rare samples such as meteorites because of non-destructivity and relatively being free from contaminations. The objective of this research is to utilize PGA and INAA techniques for c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wee, Boon Siong, Mitsuru, Ebihara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nuklear Malaysia 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10256/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10256/1/Wee.pdf
_version_ 1848836743756775424
author Wee, Boon Siong
Mitsuru, Ebihara
author_facet Wee, Boon Siong
Mitsuru, Ebihara
author_sort Wee, Boon Siong
building UNIMAS Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Prompt gamma-ray analysis (PGA) and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) are essential for the study of rare samples such as meteorites because of non-destructivity and relatively being free from contaminations. The objective of this research is to utilize PGA and INAA techniques for comparative study and apply them to meteorite analyses. In this study, 11 meteorite samples received from the Meteorite Working Group of NASA were analyzed. The Allende meteorite powder was included as quality control material. Results from PGA and INAA for Allende showed in good agreement with literature values, signifying the reliabilities of these two methods. Elements Al, Ca, Mg, Mn, Na and Ti were determined by both methods and their results are compared. Comparison of PGA and INAA data using linear regression analysis showed correlations coefficients r2 > 0.90 for Al, Ca, Mn and Ti, 0.85 for Mg, and 0.38 for Na. The PGA results for Na using 472 keV were less accurate due to the interference from the broad B peak. Therefore, Na results from INAA method are preferred. For other elements (Al, Ca, Mg, Mn and Ti), PGA and INAA results can be used as cross-reference for consistency. The PGA and INAA techniques have been applied to meteorite samples and results are comparable to literature values compiled from previously analyzed meteorites. In summary, both PGA and INAA methods give reasonably good agreement and are indispensable in the study of meteorites.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T06:28:37Z
format Article
id unimas-10256
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T06:28:37Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Nuklear Malaysia
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling unimas-102562021-07-05T13:54:46Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10256/ Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples Wee, Boon Siong Mitsuru, Ebihara TP Chemical technology Prompt gamma-ray analysis (PGA) and instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) are essential for the study of rare samples such as meteorites because of non-destructivity and relatively being free from contaminations. The objective of this research is to utilize PGA and INAA techniques for comparative study and apply them to meteorite analyses. In this study, 11 meteorite samples received from the Meteorite Working Group of NASA were analyzed. The Allende meteorite powder was included as quality control material. Results from PGA and INAA for Allende showed in good agreement with literature values, signifying the reliabilities of these two methods. Elements Al, Ca, Mg, Mn, Na and Ti were determined by both methods and their results are compared. Comparison of PGA and INAA data using linear regression analysis showed correlations coefficients r2 > 0.90 for Al, Ca, Mn and Ti, 0.85 for Mg, and 0.38 for Na. The PGA results for Na using 472 keV were less accurate due to the interference from the broad B peak. Therefore, Na results from INAA method are preferred. For other elements (Al, Ca, Mg, Mn and Ti), PGA and INAA results can be used as cross-reference for consistency. The PGA and INAA techniques have been applied to meteorite samples and results are comparable to literature values compiled from previously analyzed meteorites. In summary, both PGA and INAA methods give reasonably good agreement and are indispensable in the study of meteorites. Nuklear Malaysia 2011 Article NonPeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10256/1/Wee.pdf Wee, Boon Siong and Mitsuru, Ebihara (2011) Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples. Jurnal Sains Nuklear Malaysia, 23 (2). pp. 74-80. ISSN 2232-0946 https://scholar.google.com.my/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=KmdSVJMAAAAJ&cstart=20&pagesize=80&citation_for_view=KmdSVJMAAAAJ:qjMakFHDy7sC
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Wee, Boon Siong
Mitsuru, Ebihara
Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples
title Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples
title_full Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples
title_fullStr Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples
title_short Comparative Study of Pga And INAA for Analyses Of Meteorite Samples
title_sort comparative study of pga and inaa for analyses of meteorite samples
topic TP Chemical technology
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10256/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10256/
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10256/1/Wee.pdf