The process approach to the teaching of writing in Malaysian secondary schools in Sarawak : theory and practice
The English Language teaching profession of Malaysia is continually searching actively for pedagogical innovations which will improve the teaching of English as ESLIEFL for its secondary school students throughout the country. One recent `revolutionary' innovation, process writing, has broug...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Final Year Project Report / IMRAD |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, (UNIMAS)
1997
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10133/ http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/10133/8/The%20process%20approach%20to%20the%20teaching%20of%20writing%20in%20Malaysian%20secondary%20schools%20in%20Sarawal-theory%20and%20practice%20%28fulltext%29.pdf |
| Summary: | The English Language teaching profession of Malaysia is continually searching
actively for pedagogical innovations which will improve the teaching of English as
ESLIEFL for its secondary school students throughout the country. One recent
`revolutionary' innovation, process writing, has brought. about many controversial
issues among the ESL/EFL teachers in Sarawak, as they sort through their own
ideologies and visions of the teaching-learning process. The present study
attempts to investigate the (a) response of teachers and (b) the barriers behind the
hesitancy of many teachers to use the process writing approach to teach writing in
schools. Results indicated that there is a tapestry of factors determining the nonfeasibility
of the process writing approach in the teaching of writing. Student
attitudes towards the language and learning, are interwoven tightly with classtime,
teacher-workloads, competing teacher-priorities and differing teacher.
ideologies regarding student-language competence and performance, as well as the
success of language learning. The major recommendation of this study is the
importance of flexibility. Teachers should "marry" different teaching strategies
with process writing to suit the needs and language ability of the students and the
competing priorities for teachers' dass-time. |
|---|