Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures

Tubing is usually used in crude oil instrumentation system, natural gas, industrial gas, and food industry. With the involvement of the oil and gas tubing, many products would be affordable to be manufactured and the costs to convey these products to market would be economical. Products marking in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zaitul Aqmal, Mohd Asri
Format: Undergraduates Project Papers
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9455/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9455/1/Physical%20test%20of%20stainless%20steel%20316%20between%20different%20manufactures.pdf
_version_ 1848818495707414528
author Zaitul Aqmal, Mohd Asri
author_facet Zaitul Aqmal, Mohd Asri
author_sort Zaitul Aqmal, Mohd Asri
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Tubing is usually used in crude oil instrumentation system, natural gas, industrial gas, and food industry. With the involvement of the oil and gas tubing, many products would be affordable to be manufactured and the costs to convey these products to market would be economical. Products marking in the tubes include manufacture name or brand, specification number and grade on tubes. Different manufacture has different material characteristic although it is of the same grade. Thus, this research is perform to determine the modulus of elasticity, tensile strength and yield strength of stainless steel 316 from different manufactures. Comparison of modulus of elasticity, tensile strength and yield strength of stainless steel 316 from different manufactures are made. By appropriate scaling, load and displacement data that were obtained in the test were calibrated and cross-plotted to give an engineering stress-strain curve for each and every specimen. From the Universal Tensile Machine, graph of force versus displacement is generated. From the stress-strain curve, values of modulus of elasticity, ductility, tensile strength and yield strength for Sample A were 12869.22 MPa, 44.04501932%, 548 MPa, and 332.7333 MPa respectively. And for values of modulus of elasticity, ductility, tensile strength and yield strength for Sample B were 12722.43 MPa, 36.09215017%, 536.6667 MPa, and 314 MPa respectively. From the values that were obtained, the material characteristics of Sample A are found to be stronger than Sample B.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T01:38:34Z
format Undergraduates Project Papers
id ump-9455
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T01:38:34Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-94552023-11-02T04:31:37Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9455/ Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures Zaitul Aqmal, Mohd Asri TS Manufactures Tubing is usually used in crude oil instrumentation system, natural gas, industrial gas, and food industry. With the involvement of the oil and gas tubing, many products would be affordable to be manufactured and the costs to convey these products to market would be economical. Products marking in the tubes include manufacture name or brand, specification number and grade on tubes. Different manufacture has different material characteristic although it is of the same grade. Thus, this research is perform to determine the modulus of elasticity, tensile strength and yield strength of stainless steel 316 from different manufactures. Comparison of modulus of elasticity, tensile strength and yield strength of stainless steel 316 from different manufactures are made. By appropriate scaling, load and displacement data that were obtained in the test were calibrated and cross-plotted to give an engineering stress-strain curve for each and every specimen. From the Universal Tensile Machine, graph of force versus displacement is generated. From the stress-strain curve, values of modulus of elasticity, ductility, tensile strength and yield strength for Sample A were 12869.22 MPa, 44.04501932%, 548 MPa, and 332.7333 MPa respectively. And for values of modulus of elasticity, ductility, tensile strength and yield strength for Sample B were 12722.43 MPa, 36.09215017%, 536.6667 MPa, and 314 MPa respectively. From the values that were obtained, the material characteristics of Sample A are found to be stronger than Sample B. 2013-07 Undergraduates Project Papers NonPeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9455/1/Physical%20test%20of%20stainless%20steel%20316%20between%20different%20manufactures.pdf Zaitul Aqmal, Mohd Asri (2013) Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures. Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang.
spellingShingle TS Manufactures
Zaitul Aqmal, Mohd Asri
Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures
title Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures
title_full Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures
title_fullStr Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures
title_full_unstemmed Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures
title_short Physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures
title_sort physical test of stainless steel 316 between different manufactures
topic TS Manufactures
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9455/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/9455/1/Physical%20test%20of%20stainless%20steel%20316%20between%20different%20manufactures.pdf