A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories

The CEFR level descriptors are applied globally for language assessment, which is already aligned with IELTS, TOEFL, etc. Meanwhile, the CET4 is essential in language learning and teaching proficiency assessment in China. Building on previous research, this study examines the relationship between th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, Changlin, Nik Aloesnita, Nik Mohd Alwi, Mohammad Musab, Azmat Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Secholian Publication 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/1/3251-Article%20Text-A%20Comparative%20Review%20of%20the%20CEFR%20and%20CET4%20Writing%20Assessment.pdf
_version_ 1848827062669803520
author Li, Changlin
Nik Aloesnita, Nik Mohd Alwi
Mohammad Musab, Azmat Ali
author_facet Li, Changlin
Nik Aloesnita, Nik Mohd Alwi
Mohammad Musab, Azmat Ali
author_sort Li, Changlin
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The CEFR level descriptors are applied globally for language assessment, which is already aligned with IELTS, TOEFL, etc. Meanwhile, the CET4 is essential in language learning and teaching proficiency assessment in China. Building on previous research, this study examines the relationship between the CEFR level descriptors and the CET4 writing rubrics, mainly focusing on the essay writing assessment within the past decade. Despite the broad utilisation of the CET4 in universities, its comparison with the CEFR level descriptors remains underexplored. Based on this situation, the study investigates task complexity theories, automated and manual scoring systems, and recent studies about essay writing. Findings indicate that the CET4 writing scores correspond roughly to CEFR levels A1–B2, though comparisons with higher proficiency levels (C1–C2) remain inconsistent. While automated scoring systems reliably evaluate basic linguistic dimensions, they struggle to assess more aspects, such as description, argument, task relevance, and clarity dimensions, under the CEFR and CET4 writing assessments. Furthermore, the automated scoring systems lack the capacity to capture the nuanced features of advanced writing. These findings underscore the necessity of human evaluation, particularly in essay writing content assessment, while highlighting opportunities to refine grading methodologies and task design to enhance essay writing instruction.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T03:54:45Z
format Article
id ump-44252
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T03:54:45Z
publishDate 2025
publisher Secholian Publication
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-442522025-05-09T04:37:02Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/ A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories Li, Changlin Nik Aloesnita, Nik Mohd Alwi Mohammad Musab, Azmat Ali L Education (General) LB2300 Higher Education The CEFR level descriptors are applied globally for language assessment, which is already aligned with IELTS, TOEFL, etc. Meanwhile, the CET4 is essential in language learning and teaching proficiency assessment in China. Building on previous research, this study examines the relationship between the CEFR level descriptors and the CET4 writing rubrics, mainly focusing on the essay writing assessment within the past decade. Despite the broad utilisation of the CET4 in universities, its comparison with the CEFR level descriptors remains underexplored. Based on this situation, the study investigates task complexity theories, automated and manual scoring systems, and recent studies about essay writing. Findings indicate that the CET4 writing scores correspond roughly to CEFR levels A1–B2, though comparisons with higher proficiency levels (C1–C2) remain inconsistent. While automated scoring systems reliably evaluate basic linguistic dimensions, they struggle to assess more aspects, such as description, argument, task relevance, and clarity dimensions, under the CEFR and CET4 writing assessments. Furthermore, the automated scoring systems lack the capacity to capture the nuanced features of advanced writing. These findings underscore the necessity of human evaluation, particularly in essay writing content assessment, while highlighting opportunities to refine grading methodologies and task design to enhance essay writing instruction. Secholian Publication 2025 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/1/3251-Article%20Text-A%20Comparative%20Review%20of%20the%20CEFR%20and%20CET4%20Writing%20Assessment.pdf Li, Changlin and Nik Aloesnita, Nik Mohd Alwi and Mohammad Musab, Azmat Ali (2025) A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 10 (3). pp. 1-21. ISSN 2504-8562. (Published) https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v10i3.3251 10.47405/mjssh.v10i3.3251
spellingShingle L Education (General)
LB2300 Higher Education
Li, Changlin
Nik Aloesnita, Nik Mohd Alwi
Mohammad Musab, Azmat Ali
A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories
title A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories
title_full A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories
title_fullStr A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories
title_full_unstemmed A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories
title_short A comparative review of the CEFR and CET4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories
title_sort comparative review of the cefr and cet4 writing assessment with insights from task complexity theories
topic L Education (General)
LB2300 Higher Education
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/44252/1/3251-Article%20Text-A%20Comparative%20Review%20of%20the%20CEFR%20and%20CET4%20Writing%20Assessment.pdf