Battery remaining useful life estimation based on particle swarm optimization-neural network
Determining the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a battery is essential for several purposes, including proactive maintenance planning, optimizing resource allocation, preventing unforeseen failures, improving safety, extending battery lifespan, and achieving accurate cost savings. Concerning that mat...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier B.V.
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42916/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42916/1/Battery%20remaining%20useful%20life%20estimation%20based%20on%20particle%20swarm%20optimization-neural%20network.pdf |
| Summary: | Determining the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a battery is essential for several purposes, including proactive maintenance planning, optimizing resource allocation, preventing unforeseen failures, improving safety, extending battery lifespan, and achieving accurate cost savings. Concerning that matter, this study proposed hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization–Neural Network (PSO NN) for estimating battery RUL. In the evaluation of the proposed method, the effectiveness is assessed using the metrics of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The dataset employed for this investigation comprises eight input parameters and one output variable, representing the battery RUL. In conducting an analysis, the performance of the PSO NN model is compared with hybrid NN with Cultural Algorithm (CA-NN) and Harmony Search Algorithm (HSA-NN), as well as the standalone Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA). Upon examination of the findings, it becomes evident that the PSO NN model outperforms the alternatives with an MAE of 2.7708 and an RMSE of 4.3468, significantly lower than HSA-NN (MAE: 22.0583, RMSE: 34.5154), CA-NN (MAE: 9.1189, RMSE: 22.4646), and ARIMA (MAE: 494.6275, RMSE: 584.3098). The PSO NN also achieves the lowest maximum error of 104.7381 compared to 490.3125 for HSA-NN, 827.0163 for CA-NN, and 1,160.0000 for ARIMA. Additionally, the low two-tail probability values (P(T ≤ t)), all below the significance level of 0.05, indicate that the differences between PSO NN and the other methods (HSA-NN, CA-NN, and ARIMA) are statistically significant. These results highlight the superior accuracy and robustness of the PSO NN model in predicting battery RUL. This study contributes to the field by presenting the PSO NN as a highly effective tool for accurate battery RUL estimation, as evidenced by its superior performance over alternative methods. |
|---|