Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach

Firefighters frequently face the risk of Low back pain (LBP) due to the strenuous nature of their duties, especially during hose rolling tasks. Prioritizing their safety and health is vital. This study aimed to evaluate and compare various hose rolling techniques to lower the LBP risk in firefighter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Luqman Hakim, Mustapha, Salwa, Mahmood, Helmy Mustafa, El Bakri, Ismail, Abdul Rahman, Mohd Fahmi, Badulrudin, Norazlianie, Sazali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Semarak Ilmu Publishing 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/1/Firefighter%20Hose%20Rolling%20Method%20Low%20Back%20Pain%20Risks%20Analysis%20with%20Full-Factorial%20Approach.pdf
_version_ 1848826530465054720
author Mohammad Luqman Hakim, Mustapha
Salwa, Mahmood
Helmy Mustafa, El Bakri
Ismail, Abdul Rahman
Mohd Fahmi, Badulrudin
Norazlianie, Sazali
author_facet Mohammad Luqman Hakim, Mustapha
Salwa, Mahmood
Helmy Mustafa, El Bakri
Ismail, Abdul Rahman
Mohd Fahmi, Badulrudin
Norazlianie, Sazali
author_sort Mohammad Luqman Hakim, Mustapha
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Firefighters frequently face the risk of Low back pain (LBP) due to the strenuous nature of their duties, especially during hose rolling tasks. Prioritizing their safety and health is vital. This study aimed to evaluate and compare various hose rolling techniques to lower the LBP risk in firefighters. A full-factorial approach was employed to exhaustively examine every possible combination of three key factors: the hose rolling method (conventional, mechanical, motorized), hose condition (dry, wet, dirty), and hose length (10, 20, 30 meters). Across 27 different trials, an Industrial Lumbar Motion Monitor (iLMM) was used to assess the LBP risk, which is lift rate, average twisting velocity, maximum moment, maximum sagittal flexion, and maximum lateral velocity. The study's results indicated that conventional method had the highest LBP risk at 58.22%, with mechanical rolling at 34.33%. In contrast, the motorized hose rolling method showed a significantly lower risk, averaging at 17.44%. This denotes a 40.78% reduction in LBP risk compared to conventional hose rolling method, positioning the motorized roller as the most effective and safest option among those tested. This method's efficacy underscores its potential as a viable solution for improving firefighter safety. These findings offer important insights into occupational health and safety in firefighting. The data suggests that adopting motorized hose rolling tools could significantly alleviate the physical burdens and associated health hazards firefighters face. This advancement is a critical step towards enhancing their overall safety and well-being in the field.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T03:46:17Z
format Article
id ump-42140
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T03:46:17Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Semarak Ilmu Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-421402024-08-02T01:31:26Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/ Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach Mohammad Luqman Hakim, Mustapha Salwa, Mahmood Helmy Mustafa, El Bakri Ismail, Abdul Rahman Mohd Fahmi, Badulrudin Norazlianie, Sazali TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TS Manufactures Firefighters frequently face the risk of Low back pain (LBP) due to the strenuous nature of their duties, especially during hose rolling tasks. Prioritizing their safety and health is vital. This study aimed to evaluate and compare various hose rolling techniques to lower the LBP risk in firefighters. A full-factorial approach was employed to exhaustively examine every possible combination of three key factors: the hose rolling method (conventional, mechanical, motorized), hose condition (dry, wet, dirty), and hose length (10, 20, 30 meters). Across 27 different trials, an Industrial Lumbar Motion Monitor (iLMM) was used to assess the LBP risk, which is lift rate, average twisting velocity, maximum moment, maximum sagittal flexion, and maximum lateral velocity. The study's results indicated that conventional method had the highest LBP risk at 58.22%, with mechanical rolling at 34.33%. In contrast, the motorized hose rolling method showed a significantly lower risk, averaging at 17.44%. This denotes a 40.78% reduction in LBP risk compared to conventional hose rolling method, positioning the motorized roller as the most effective and safest option among those tested. This method's efficacy underscores its potential as a viable solution for improving firefighter safety. These findings offer important insights into occupational health and safety in firefighting. The data suggests that adopting motorized hose rolling tools could significantly alleviate the physical burdens and associated health hazards firefighters face. This advancement is a critical step towards enhancing their overall safety and well-being in the field. Semarak Ilmu Publishing 2024 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_nc_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/1/Firefighter%20Hose%20Rolling%20Method%20Low%20Back%20Pain%20Risks%20Analysis%20with%20Full-Factorial%20Approach.pdf Mohammad Luqman Hakim, Mustapha and Salwa, Mahmood and Helmy Mustafa, El Bakri and Ismail, Abdul Rahman and Mohd Fahmi, Badulrudin and Norazlianie, Sazali (2024) Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics, 121 (1). pp. 197-210. ISSN 2289-7895. (Published) https://doi.org/10.37934/aram.121.1.197210 10.37934/aram.121.1.197210
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TS Manufactures
Mohammad Luqman Hakim, Mustapha
Salwa, Mahmood
Helmy Mustafa, El Bakri
Ismail, Abdul Rahman
Mohd Fahmi, Badulrudin
Norazlianie, Sazali
Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach
title Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach
title_full Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach
title_fullStr Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach
title_full_unstemmed Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach
title_short Firefighter hose rolling method: Low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach
title_sort firefighter hose rolling method: low back pain risks analysis with full-factorial approach
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TS Manufactures
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/42140/1/Firefighter%20Hose%20Rolling%20Method%20Low%20Back%20Pain%20Risks%20Analysis%20with%20Full-Factorial%20Approach.pdf