Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates

It is known that carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminate is the third generation of fibre metal materials. This study investigates the response of carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates (CARALL) under tensile loading and three-point bending tests, which evaluate the damage initiation and pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hu, Haichao, Wei, Qiang, Liu, Boya, Liu, Yun, Hu, Ning, Quanjin, Ma, Wang, Chuancai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/1/Progressive%20damage%20behaviour%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20with%202d_3d%20hashin.pdf
_version_ 1848825963268276224
author Hu, Haichao
Wei, Qiang
Liu, Boya
Liu, Yun
Hu, Ning
Quanjin, Ma
Wang, Chuancai
author_facet Hu, Haichao
Wei, Qiang
Liu, Boya
Liu, Yun
Hu, Ning
Quanjin, Ma
Wang, Chuancai
author_sort Hu, Haichao
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description It is known that carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminate is the third generation of fibre metal materials. This study investigates the response of carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates (CARALL) under tensile loading and three-point bending tests, which evaluate the damage initiation and propagation mechanism. The 2D Hashin and 3D Hashin VUMAT models are used to analyse and compare each composite layer for finite element modelling. A bilinear cohesive contact model is modelled for the interface failure, and the Johnson cook model describes the aluminium layer. The mechanical response and failure analysis of CARALL were evaluated using load versus deflection curves, and the scanning electron microscope was adopted. The results revealed that the failure modes of CARALL were mainly observed in the aluminium layer fracture, fibre pull-out, fracture, and matrix tensile fracture under tensile and flexural loading conditions. The 2D Hashin and 3D Hashin models were similar in predicting tensile properties, flexural properties, mechanical response before peak load points, and final failure modes. It is highlighted that the 3D Hashin model can accurately reveal the failure mechanism and failure propagation mechanism of CARALL.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T03:37:16Z
format Article
id ump-40137
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T03:37:16Z
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-401372024-02-05T07:28:33Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/ Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates Hu, Haichao Wei, Qiang Liu, Boya Liu, Yun Hu, Ning Quanjin, Ma Wang, Chuancai T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics It is known that carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminate is the third generation of fibre metal materials. This study investigates the response of carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates (CARALL) under tensile loading and three-point bending tests, which evaluate the damage initiation and propagation mechanism. The 2D Hashin and 3D Hashin VUMAT models are used to analyse and compare each composite layer for finite element modelling. A bilinear cohesive contact model is modelled for the interface failure, and the Johnson cook model describes the aluminium layer. The mechanical response and failure analysis of CARALL were evaluated using load versus deflection curves, and the scanning electron microscope was adopted. The results revealed that the failure modes of CARALL were mainly observed in the aluminium layer fracture, fibre pull-out, fracture, and matrix tensile fracture under tensile and flexural loading conditions. The 2D Hashin and 3D Hashin models were similar in predicting tensile properties, flexural properties, mechanical response before peak load points, and final failure modes. It is highlighted that the 3D Hashin model can accurately reveal the failure mechanism and failure propagation mechanism of CARALL. MDPI 2022-07 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/1/Progressive%20damage%20behaviour%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20with%202d_3d%20hashin.pdf Hu, Haichao and Wei, Qiang and Liu, Boya and Liu, Yun and Hu, Ning and Quanjin, Ma and Wang, Chuancai (2022) Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates. Polymers, 14 (2946). pp. 1-25. ISSN 2073-4360. (Published) https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142946 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14142946
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
Hu, Haichao
Wei, Qiang
Liu, Boya
Liu, Yun
Hu, Ning
Quanjin, Ma
Wang, Chuancai
Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates
title Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates
title_full Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates
title_fullStr Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates
title_full_unstemmed Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates
title_short Progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2D/3D hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates
title_sort progressive damage behaviour analysis and comparison with 2d/3d hashin failure models on carbon fibre–reinforced aluminium laminates
topic T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TL Motor vehicles. Aeronautics. Astronautics
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/40137/1/Progressive%20damage%20behaviour%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20with%202d_3d%20hashin.pdf