A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective

The attributes or criteria used in the requirements prioritization process become an essential reference in calculating priorities. Most of the techniques are used to increase the value impacting business success. On the contrary, there are limitations on cost, time, and resources for developing sof...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan, Amelia, Rozlina, Mohamed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/1/3.%20PERTANIKA%202023%20-%2011%20JST-3328-2021.pdf
_version_ 1848825064486600704
author Tan, Amelia
Rozlina, Mohamed
author_facet Tan, Amelia
Rozlina, Mohamed
author_sort Tan, Amelia
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The attributes or criteria used in the requirements prioritization process become an essential reference in calculating priorities. Most of the techniques are used to increase the value impacting business success. On the contrary, there are limitations on cost, time, and resources for developing software. Therefore, the requirements prioritization process often requires collaboration from the perspectives involved. So far, the pattern and basis have not been seen in the criteria used in the requirements prioritization process. Consequently, there need to be other factors that become a reference so that the selection of criteria is appropriate. This study identifies criteria based on the categorized perspectives of requirements prioritization. A systematic literature review presents criteria for prioritizing requirements from multiple collaborative perspectives. Findings show that the criteria in requirements prioritization can be classified into beneficial and non-beneficial, where business value and development cost are the most frequently used criteria. Furthermore, the involvement of multiple perspectives in requirements prioritization focuses on the client’s and developer’s perspectives. The findings also reveal that some of the challenges in the requirements prioritization process are biases by stakeholders, reducing pairwise comparison, and scalability. In the future, it will be investigated whether the selection of criteria correlated with stakeholder perspectives will increase the accuracy of priorities. Thus, the contribution of this paper is to recommend criteria from stakeholders’ perspectives.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T03:22:59Z
format Article
id ump-36714
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T03:22:59Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-367142025-07-22T06:40:11Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/ A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective Tan, Amelia Rozlina, Mohamed QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science QA76 Computer software The attributes or criteria used in the requirements prioritization process become an essential reference in calculating priorities. Most of the techniques are used to increase the value impacting business success. On the contrary, there are limitations on cost, time, and resources for developing software. Therefore, the requirements prioritization process often requires collaboration from the perspectives involved. So far, the pattern and basis have not been seen in the criteria used in the requirements prioritization process. Consequently, there need to be other factors that become a reference so that the selection of criteria is appropriate. This study identifies criteria based on the categorized perspectives of requirements prioritization. A systematic literature review presents criteria for prioritizing requirements from multiple collaborative perspectives. Findings show that the criteria in requirements prioritization can be classified into beneficial and non-beneficial, where business value and development cost are the most frequently used criteria. Furthermore, the involvement of multiple perspectives in requirements prioritization focuses on the client’s and developer’s perspectives. The findings also reveal that some of the challenges in the requirements prioritization process are biases by stakeholders, reducing pairwise comparison, and scalability. In the future, it will be investigated whether the selection of criteria correlated with stakeholder perspectives will increase the accuracy of priorities. Thus, the contribution of this paper is to recommend criteria from stakeholders’ perspectives. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2022-10-21 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/1/3.%20PERTANIKA%202023%20-%2011%20JST-3328-2021.pdf Tan, Amelia and Rozlina, Mohamed (2022) A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 31 (1). pp. 161-185. ISSN 0128-7680 (Printed); 2231-8526 (Online);. (Published) http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/ https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.1.11
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
QA76 Computer software
Tan, Amelia
Rozlina, Mohamed
A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective
title A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective
title_full A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective
title_fullStr A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective
title_full_unstemmed A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective
title_short A review: Requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective
title_sort review: requirements prioritization criteria within collaboration perspective
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
QA76 Computer software
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/36714/1/3.%20PERTANIKA%202023%20-%2011%20JST-3328-2021.pdf