The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations

The exhaustion of fossil fuels causes decarbonized industries to be powered by renewable energy sources and, owing to their intermittent nature, it is important to devise an efficient energy storage method. To make them more sustainable, a storage system is required. Modern electricity storage syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Solomin, E., Selvanathan, S.P., Kumarasamy, S., Kovalyov, A., Maddappa Srinivasa, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/1/The%20comparison%20of%20solar-powered%20hydrogen%20closed-cycle%20system%20capacities.pdf
_version_ 1848824193918959616
author Solomin, E.
Selvanathan, S.P.
Kumarasamy, S.
Kovalyov, A.
Maddappa Srinivasa, R.
author_facet Solomin, E.
Selvanathan, S.P.
Kumarasamy, S.
Kovalyov, A.
Maddappa Srinivasa, R.
author_sort Solomin, E.
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The exhaustion of fossil fuels causes decarbonized industries to be powered by renewable energy sources and, owing to their intermittent nature, it is important to devise an efficient energy storage method. To make them more sustainable, a storage system is required. Modern electricity storage systems are based on different types of chemical batteries, electromechanical devices, and hydrogen power plants. However, the parameters of power plant components vary from one geographical location to another. The idea of the present research is to compare the composition of a solar-powered hydrogen processing closed-cycle power plant among the selected geographical locations (Russia, India, and Australia), assuming the same power consumption conditions, but different insolation conditions, and thus the hydrogen equipment capacity accordingly. The number of solar modules in an array is different, thus the required hydrogen tank capacity is also different. The comparison of equipment requires building an uninterrupted power supply for the selected geographical locations, which shows that the capacity of the equipment components would be significantly different. These numbers may serve as the base for further economic calculations of energy cost.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T03:09:09Z
format Article
id ump-33177
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T03:09:09Z
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI AG
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-331772022-11-11T09:20:54Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/ The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations Solomin, E. Selvanathan, S.P. Kumarasamy, S. Kovalyov, A. Maddappa Srinivasa, R. T Technology (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery TP Chemical technology The exhaustion of fossil fuels causes decarbonized industries to be powered by renewable energy sources and, owing to their intermittent nature, it is important to devise an efficient energy storage method. To make them more sustainable, a storage system is required. Modern electricity storage systems are based on different types of chemical batteries, electromechanical devices, and hydrogen power plants. However, the parameters of power plant components vary from one geographical location to another. The idea of the present research is to compare the composition of a solar-powered hydrogen processing closed-cycle power plant among the selected geographical locations (Russia, India, and Australia), assuming the same power consumption conditions, but different insolation conditions, and thus the hydrogen equipment capacity accordingly. The number of solar modules in an array is different, thus the required hydrogen tank capacity is also different. The comparison of equipment requires building an uninterrupted power supply for the selected geographical locations, which shows that the capacity of the equipment components would be significantly different. These numbers may serve as the base for further economic calculations of energy cost. MDPI AG 2021-05-01 Article PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by_4 http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/1/The%20comparison%20of%20solar-powered%20hydrogen%20closed-cycle%20system%20capacities.pdf Solomin, E. and Selvanathan, S.P. and Kumarasamy, S. and Kovalyov, A. and Maddappa Srinivasa, R. (2021) The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations. Energies, 14 (9). pp. 1-18. ISSN 1996-1073. (Published) https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092722 https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092722
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TP Chemical technology
Solomin, E.
Selvanathan, S.P.
Kumarasamy, S.
Kovalyov, A.
Maddappa Srinivasa, R.
The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations
title The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations
title_full The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations
title_fullStr The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations
title_short The comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations
title_sort comparison of solar-powered hydrogen closed-cycle system capacities for selected locations
topic T Technology (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
TP Chemical technology
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/33177/1/The%20comparison%20of%20solar-powered%20hydrogen%20closed-cycle%20system%20capacities.pdf