Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method

Analysis of slope stability is very important as many structures in hilly areas failed due to instability of slope. The aim of this study is to determine the factor of safety (FOS) of slopes located at Pahang Matriculation College by using limit equilibrium method. Two methods known as modified Fell...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. F., Zolkepli, Mohd Fakhrurrazi, Ishak, M. S. I., Zaini
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30515/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30515/1/Slope%20stability%20analysis%20using%20modified%20Felleniuss%20and%20Bishops%20method.pdf
_version_ 1848823533726072832
author M. F., Zolkepli
Mohd Fakhrurrazi, Ishak
M. S. I., Zaini
author_facet M. F., Zolkepli
Mohd Fakhrurrazi, Ishak
M. S. I., Zaini
author_sort M. F., Zolkepli
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Analysis of slope stability is very important as many structures in hilly areas failed due to instability of slope. The aim of this study is to determine the factor of safety (FOS) of slopes located at Pahang Matriculation College by using limit equilibrium method. Two methods known as modified Fellenius's method and modified Bishop's method are used in this study. Laboratory testing involving index and engineering properties are conducted to determine the properties of soil within the study area. The soil at Pahang Matriculation College can be classified as sandy SILT with high plasticity. From the analysis, the FOS values for two slopes in saturated soil conditions (0 kPa suction) are between 1.262-2.885 when using Bishop's method which are higher compare to 1.199-2.688 when using Fellenius's method. The percentage differences of FOS between these two methods are between 5.25% to 7.33%. For slopes in unsaturated conditions (20 kPa suctions), the FOS are between 1.550-3.702 when using modified Bishop's method which always higher compare to 1.492-3.507 when using modified Fellenius's method. The percentage differences of FOS are between 3.89% to 5.56%. The relative accuracy of Bishop's method is due to it consider only the vertical equilibrium of each slices and there is no need to consider the horizontal components of the interslice forces without introducing serious error in the FOS value.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T02:58:39Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id ump-30515
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T02:58:39Z
publishDate 2019
publisher IOP Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-305152021-02-08T04:06:45Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30515/ Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method M. F., Zolkepli Mohd Fakhrurrazi, Ishak M. S. I., Zaini TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Analysis of slope stability is very important as many structures in hilly areas failed due to instability of slope. The aim of this study is to determine the factor of safety (FOS) of slopes located at Pahang Matriculation College by using limit equilibrium method. Two methods known as modified Fellenius's method and modified Bishop's method are used in this study. Laboratory testing involving index and engineering properties are conducted to determine the properties of soil within the study area. The soil at Pahang Matriculation College can be classified as sandy SILT with high plasticity. From the analysis, the FOS values for two slopes in saturated soil conditions (0 kPa suction) are between 1.262-2.885 when using Bishop's method which are higher compare to 1.199-2.688 when using Fellenius's method. The percentage differences of FOS between these two methods are between 5.25% to 7.33%. For slopes in unsaturated conditions (20 kPa suctions), the FOS are between 1.550-3.702 when using modified Bishop's method which always higher compare to 1.492-3.507 when using modified Fellenius's method. The percentage differences of FOS are between 3.89% to 5.56%. The relative accuracy of Bishop's method is due to it consider only the vertical equilibrium of each slices and there is no need to consider the horizontal components of the interslice forces without introducing serious error in the FOS value. IOP Publishing 2019 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed pdf en cc_by http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30515/1/Slope%20stability%20analysis%20using%20modified%20Felleniuss%20and%20Bishops%20method.pdf M. F., Zolkepli and Mohd Fakhrurrazi, Ishak and M. S. I., Zaini (2019) Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 11th International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering in Tropical Regions (GEOTROPIKA) and 1st International Conference on Highway and Transportation Engineering (ICHITRA) 2019 , 27-28 February 2019 , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp. 1-13., 527 (012004). ISSN 1757-899X (Published) https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/527/1/012004
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
M. F., Zolkepli
Mohd Fakhrurrazi, Ishak
M. S. I., Zaini
Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method
title Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method
title_full Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method
title_fullStr Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method
title_full_unstemmed Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method
title_short Slope stability analysis using modified Fellenius's and Bishop's method
title_sort slope stability analysis using modified fellenius's and bishop's method
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30515/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30515/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/30515/1/Slope%20stability%20analysis%20using%20modified%20Felleniuss%20and%20Bishops%20method.pdf