Energy regulator supply restoration time

In conventional reliability analysis, the duration of interruptions relied on the input parameter of mean time to repair (MTTR) values in the network components. For certain criteria without network automation, reconfiguration functionalities and/or energy regulator requirements to protect customers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Ikhwan, Muhammad Ridzuan, Djokić, Saša Ž
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/1/Energy%20regulator%20supply%20restoration%20time.pdf
_version_ 1848822135620894720
author Mohd Ikhwan, Muhammad Ridzuan
Djokić, Saša Ž
author_facet Mohd Ikhwan, Muhammad Ridzuan
Djokić, Saša Ž
author_sort Mohd Ikhwan, Muhammad Ridzuan
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In conventional reliability analysis, the duration of interruptions relied on the input parameter of mean time to repair (MTTR) values in the network components. For certain criteria without network automation, reconfiguration functionalities and/or energy regulator requirements to protect customers from long excessive duration of interruptions, the use of MTTR input seems reasonable. Since modern distribution networks are shifting towards smart grid, some factors must be considered in the reliability assessment process. For networks that apply reconfiguration functionalities and/or network automation, the duration of interruptions experienced by a customer due to faulty network components should be addressed with an automation switch or manual action time that does not exceed the regulator supply restoration time. Hence, this paper introduces a comprehensive methodology of substituting MTTR with maximum action time required to replace/repair a network component and to restore customer duration of interruption with maximum network reconfiguration time based on energy regulator supply requirements. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) technique was applied to medium voltage (MV) suburban networks to estimate system-related reliability indices. In this analysis, the purposed method substitutes all MTTR values with time to supply (TTS), which correspond with the UK Guaranteed Standard of Performance (GSP-UK), by the condition of the MTTR value being higher than TTS value. It is nearly impossible for all components to have a quick repairing time, only components on the main feeder were selected for time substitution. Various scenarios were analysed, and the outcomes reflected the applicability of reconfiguration and the replace/repair time of network component. Theoretically, the network reconfiguration (option 1) and component replacement (option 2) with the same amount of repair time should produce exactly the same outputs. However, in simulation, these two options yield different outputs in terms of number and duration of interruptions. Each scenario has its advantages and disadvantages, in which the distribution network operators (DNOs) were selected based on their operating conditions and requirements. The regulator reliability-based network operation is more applicable than power loss-based network operation in counties that employed energy regulator requirements (e.g., GSP-UK) or areas with many factories that required a reliable continuous supply.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T02:36:26Z
format Article
id ump-24834
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T02:36:26Z
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI AG
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-248342019-07-04T01:43:09Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/ Energy regulator supply restoration time Mohd Ikhwan, Muhammad Ridzuan Djokić, Saša Ž TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering In conventional reliability analysis, the duration of interruptions relied on the input parameter of mean time to repair (MTTR) values in the network components. For certain criteria without network automation, reconfiguration functionalities and/or energy regulator requirements to protect customers from long excessive duration of interruptions, the use of MTTR input seems reasonable. Since modern distribution networks are shifting towards smart grid, some factors must be considered in the reliability assessment process. For networks that apply reconfiguration functionalities and/or network automation, the duration of interruptions experienced by a customer due to faulty network components should be addressed with an automation switch or manual action time that does not exceed the regulator supply restoration time. Hence, this paper introduces a comprehensive methodology of substituting MTTR with maximum action time required to replace/repair a network component and to restore customer duration of interruption with maximum network reconfiguration time based on energy regulator supply requirements. The Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) technique was applied to medium voltage (MV) suburban networks to estimate system-related reliability indices. In this analysis, the purposed method substitutes all MTTR values with time to supply (TTS), which correspond with the UK Guaranteed Standard of Performance (GSP-UK), by the condition of the MTTR value being higher than TTS value. It is nearly impossible for all components to have a quick repairing time, only components on the main feeder were selected for time substitution. Various scenarios were analysed, and the outcomes reflected the applicability of reconfiguration and the replace/repair time of network component. Theoretically, the network reconfiguration (option 1) and component replacement (option 2) with the same amount of repair time should produce exactly the same outputs. However, in simulation, these two options yield different outputs in terms of number and duration of interruptions. Each scenario has its advantages and disadvantages, in which the distribution network operators (DNOs) were selected based on their operating conditions and requirements. The regulator reliability-based network operation is more applicable than power loss-based network operation in counties that employed energy regulator requirements (e.g., GSP-UK) or areas with many factories that required a reliable continuous supply. MDPI AG 2019-03-19 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/1/Energy%20regulator%20supply%20restoration%20time.pdf Mohd Ikhwan, Muhammad Ridzuan and Djokić, Saša Ž (2019) Energy regulator supply restoration time. Energies, 12 (6). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1996-1073. (Published) https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061051 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061051
spellingShingle TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Mohd Ikhwan, Muhammad Ridzuan
Djokić, Saša Ž
Energy regulator supply restoration time
title Energy regulator supply restoration time
title_full Energy regulator supply restoration time
title_fullStr Energy regulator supply restoration time
title_full_unstemmed Energy regulator supply restoration time
title_short Energy regulator supply restoration time
title_sort energy regulator supply restoration time
topic TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24834/1/Energy%20regulator%20supply%20restoration%20time.pdf