Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems

This paper introduces a new single-agent metaheuristic optimization algorithm, named single-agent finite impulse response optimizer (SAFIRO). This proposed algorithm is inspired by the estimation ability of the ultimate iterative unbiased finite impulse response (UFIR) filter. The UFIR filter is one of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tasiransurini, Ab Rahman, Zuwairie, Ibrahim, Nor Azlina, Ab. Aziz, Zhao, Shunyi, Nor Hidayati, Abdul Aziz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/7/Single-Agent%20Finite%20Impulse%20Response.pdf
_version_ 1848821944684642304
author Tasiransurini, Ab Rahman
Zuwairie, Ibrahim
Nor Azlina, Ab. Aziz
Zhao, Shunyi
Nor Hidayati, Abdul Aziz
author_facet Tasiransurini, Ab Rahman
Zuwairie, Ibrahim
Nor Azlina, Ab. Aziz
Zhao, Shunyi
Nor Hidayati, Abdul Aziz
author_sort Tasiransurini, Ab Rahman
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper introduces a new single-agent metaheuristic optimization algorithm, named single-agent finite impulse response optimizer (SAFIRO). This proposed algorithm is inspired by the estimation ability of the ultimate iterative unbiased finite impulse response (UFIR) filter. The UFIR filter is one of the variants of the finite impulse response (FIR) filter, whereby in state space models, the FIR filter can be used as an option other than the Kalman filter (KF) for state estimation. Unlike the KF, the UFIR filter does not require any noise covariance, error covariance, and initial condition to calculate the state estimate. The UFIR filter also provides an iterative Kalman-like form to improve the estimation process. In the SAFIRO algorithm, the agent works as an individual UFIR to find an optimal or a near-optimal solution, where the agent needs to perform two main tasks; measurement and estimation. The performance of the SAFIRO algorithm is evaluated using the CEC 2014 Benchmark Test Suite for single-objective optimization and statistically compared with the several well-known metaheuristic optimization algorithms, such as Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm, Genetic Algorithm, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm. The experimental results show that the proposed SAFIRO algorithm is able to converge to the optimal and the near-optimal solutions, and significantly outperform all the aforementioned state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T02:33:24Z
format Article
id ump-24062
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T02:33:24Z
publishDate 2018
publisher IEEE
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-240622019-03-13T04:57:50Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/ Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems Tasiransurini, Ab Rahman Zuwairie, Ibrahim Nor Azlina, Ab. Aziz Zhao, Shunyi Nor Hidayati, Abdul Aziz QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science This paper introduces a new single-agent metaheuristic optimization algorithm, named single-agent finite impulse response optimizer (SAFIRO). This proposed algorithm is inspired by the estimation ability of the ultimate iterative unbiased finite impulse response (UFIR) filter. The UFIR filter is one of the variants of the finite impulse response (FIR) filter, whereby in state space models, the FIR filter can be used as an option other than the Kalman filter (KF) for state estimation. Unlike the KF, the UFIR filter does not require any noise covariance, error covariance, and initial condition to calculate the state estimate. The UFIR filter also provides an iterative Kalman-like form to improve the estimation process. In the SAFIRO algorithm, the agent works as an individual UFIR to find an optimal or a near-optimal solution, where the agent needs to perform two main tasks; measurement and estimation. The performance of the SAFIRO algorithm is evaluated using the CEC 2014 Benchmark Test Suite for single-objective optimization and statistically compared with the several well-known metaheuristic optimization algorithms, such as Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm, Genetic Algorithm, and Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm. The experimental results show that the proposed SAFIRO algorithm is able to converge to the optimal and the near-optimal solutions, and significantly outperform all the aforementioned state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. IEEE 2018 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/7/Single-Agent%20Finite%20Impulse%20Response.pdf Tasiransurini, Ab Rahman and Zuwairie, Ibrahim and Nor Azlina, Ab. Aziz and Zhao, Shunyi and Nor Hidayati, Abdul Aziz (2018) Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems. IEEE Access, 6. pp. 9358-9374. ISSN 2169-3536. (Published) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2777894 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2777894
spellingShingle QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Tasiransurini, Ab Rahman
Zuwairie, Ibrahim
Nor Azlina, Ab. Aziz
Zhao, Shunyi
Nor Hidayati, Abdul Aziz
Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems
title Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems
title_full Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems
title_fullStr Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems
title_full_unstemmed Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems
title_short Single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems
title_sort single-agent finite impulse response optimizer for numerical optimization problems
topic QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/24062/7/Single-Agent%20Finite%20Impulse%20Response.pdf