4P delays in project management

Purpose - As a result of the increasing challenges of time overrun, several companies regularly set up delay assessment procedures for performance improvement and profit maximization. In the construction industry, projects are enormously complicated and involve significant budgets, and therefore opt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ansah, Richard Hannis, Sorooshian, Shahryar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/1/4P%20delays%20in%20project%20management.pdf
_version_ 1848821922657206272
author Ansah, Richard Hannis
Sorooshian, Shahryar
author_facet Ansah, Richard Hannis
Sorooshian, Shahryar
author_sort Ansah, Richard Hannis
building UMP Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Purpose - As a result of the increasing challenges of time overrun, several companies regularly set up delay assessment procedures for performance improvement and profit maximization. In the construction industry, projects are enormously complicated and involve significant budgets, and therefore optimizing project performance through the root cause analysis should be imperative for every project manager. Typically issues of delays in projects are generally discussed and problematized separately, yet a comprehensive framework for systematic analysis and grouping of delays is rarely contended. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the 4P concept (project related, practices, participants, and procurement) for identifying, analyzing, and classifying delays in the internal environment of the project development process. Design/methodology/approach - The 4P conceptual framework was validated through the synthesis of the existing literature. Findings - Interestingly, despite the increasing concerns about delays in the construction industry, most research on delays are project and/or country specific, thus no consensus about the sources of delays. The application of the proposed concept as a theoretical framework would provide an understanding of the available delay sources, their risks and use for project delay assessment and classification. Research limitations/implications - This study grouped delays based on the shared characteristics and four main sources were identified and analyzed. There may be other sources or factors, yet would be dependent or aspect of the 4P. Practical implications - The study informs project teams to reduce delays in the construction industry. Originality/value - The paper is an application of risk assessment tool to conceptualize delays in the internal project environment.
first_indexed 2025-11-15T02:33:03Z
format Article
id ump-23936
institution Universiti Malaysia Pahang
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-15T02:33:03Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Emerald
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ump-239362020-02-21T07:48:23Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/ 4P delays in project management Ansah, Richard Hannis Sorooshian, Shahryar AM Museums (General). Collectors and collecting (General) Purpose - As a result of the increasing challenges of time overrun, several companies regularly set up delay assessment procedures for performance improvement and profit maximization. In the construction industry, projects are enormously complicated and involve significant budgets, and therefore optimizing project performance through the root cause analysis should be imperative for every project manager. Typically issues of delays in projects are generally discussed and problematized separately, yet a comprehensive framework for systematic analysis and grouping of delays is rarely contended. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the 4P concept (project related, practices, participants, and procurement) for identifying, analyzing, and classifying delays in the internal environment of the project development process. Design/methodology/approach - The 4P conceptual framework was validated through the synthesis of the existing literature. Findings - Interestingly, despite the increasing concerns about delays in the construction industry, most research on delays are project and/or country specific, thus no consensus about the sources of delays. The application of the proposed concept as a theoretical framework would provide an understanding of the available delay sources, their risks and use for project delay assessment and classification. Research limitations/implications - This study grouped delays based on the shared characteristics and four main sources were identified and analyzed. There may be other sources or factors, yet would be dependent or aspect of the 4P. Practical implications - The study informs project teams to reduce delays in the construction industry. Originality/value - The paper is an application of risk assessment tool to conceptualize delays in the internal project environment. Emerald 2018 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/1/4P%20delays%20in%20project%20management.pdf Ansah, Richard Hannis and Sorooshian, Shahryar (2018) 4P delays in project management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25 (1). pp. 62-76. ISSN 0969-9988 (Print); 1365-232X (Online). (Published) https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2016-0199 https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2016-0199
spellingShingle AM Museums (General). Collectors and collecting (General)
Ansah, Richard Hannis
Sorooshian, Shahryar
4P delays in project management
title 4P delays in project management
title_full 4P delays in project management
title_fullStr 4P delays in project management
title_full_unstemmed 4P delays in project management
title_short 4P delays in project management
title_sort 4p delays in project management
topic AM Museums (General). Collectors and collecting (General)
url http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/
http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/23936/1/4P%20delays%20in%20project%20management.pdf