Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework
The characteristic and inherent risks in construction projects present key difficulties to stakeholders and project teams. Risk appraisal is a significant step toward potential variables identification and evaluation. In risk assessment, adequate categorization and prioritization aid planning, budge...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Romanian Society for Quality Assurance - SRAC
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19786/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19786/1/Constructions%20Project%20Management%20Risks%E2%80%99%20Framework.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848820962471968768 |
|---|---|
| author | Ansah, Richard Hannis Sorooshian, Shahryar Shariman, Mustafa Oluyinka, Oludapo Samson |
| author_facet | Ansah, Richard Hannis Sorooshian, Shahryar Shariman, Mustafa Oluyinka, Oludapo Samson |
| author_sort | Ansah, Richard Hannis |
| building | UMP Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The characteristic and inherent risks in construction projects present key difficulties to stakeholders and project teams. Risk appraisal is a significant step toward potential variables identification and evaluation. In risk assessment, adequate categorization and prioritization aid planning, budgeting and management of project related risks. In this paper, an analysis of the risks associated with the delay sources in the internal environment of Malaysian construction projects have been presented based on risk priority number (RPN) to determine the degree of severity, occurrence and detection. Through literature review, eighty one risks under four main delay sources were extracted for further analysis. From the results, the main risks include contractor’s financial problems, poor coordination by the contractor, change orders, client’s financial problems, errors and defective work, poor materials management, poor
communication between consultant and contractor, unrealistic contract duration, poor procurement tools and methods, unavailability of materials and labors, ineffective coordination by project managers, poor construction site
layout, changes in material types and specification, inaccuracies in estimation and budgeting, delays in approvals, respectively. This study would provide a decision tool for prioritizing and categorizing risks in construction projects to build a realistic and rational resources allocation guide. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-15T02:17:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | ump-19786 |
| institution | Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-15T02:17:47Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Romanian Society for Quality Assurance - SRAC |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | ump-197862020-02-21T07:48:47Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19786/ Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework Ansah, Richard Hannis Sorooshian, Shahryar Shariman, Mustafa Oluyinka, Oludapo Samson HD28 Management. Industrial Management The characteristic and inherent risks in construction projects present key difficulties to stakeholders and project teams. Risk appraisal is a significant step toward potential variables identification and evaluation. In risk assessment, adequate categorization and prioritization aid planning, budgeting and management of project related risks. In this paper, an analysis of the risks associated with the delay sources in the internal environment of Malaysian construction projects have been presented based on risk priority number (RPN) to determine the degree of severity, occurrence and detection. Through literature review, eighty one risks under four main delay sources were extracted for further analysis. From the results, the main risks include contractor’s financial problems, poor coordination by the contractor, change orders, client’s financial problems, errors and defective work, poor materials management, poor communication between consultant and contractor, unrealistic contract duration, poor procurement tools and methods, unavailability of materials and labors, ineffective coordination by project managers, poor construction site layout, changes in material types and specification, inaccuracies in estimation and budgeting, delays in approvals, respectively. This study would provide a decision tool for prioritizing and categorizing risks in construction projects to build a realistic and rational resources allocation guide. Romanian Society for Quality Assurance - SRAC 2017 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19786/1/Constructions%20Project%20Management%20Risks%E2%80%99%20Framework.pdf Ansah, Richard Hannis and Sorooshian, Shahryar and Shariman, Mustafa and Oluyinka, Oludapo Samson (2017) Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework. Quality - Access to Success, 18 (158). pp. 90-95. ISSN 1582-2559. (Published) http://www.srac.ro/calitatea/en/arhiva/2017/2017-03-Abstracts.pdf |
| spellingShingle | HD28 Management. Industrial Management Ansah, Richard Hannis Sorooshian, Shahryar Shariman, Mustafa Oluyinka, Oludapo Samson Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework |
| title | Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework |
| title_full | Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework |
| title_fullStr | Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework |
| title_full_unstemmed | Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework |
| title_short | Constructions Project Management Risks’ Framework |
| title_sort | constructions project management risks’ framework |
| topic | HD28 Management. Industrial Management |
| url | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19786/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19786/ http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/19786/1/Constructions%20Project%20Management%20Risks%E2%80%99%20Framework.pdf |