Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani

Tight competition between manufacturers forces them to look for new ways to increase productivity and quality and hence reduce costs. These efforts have led researchers to develop methods such as the DFX Tools: Design for Manufacturing, Design for Assembly, Design for Disassembly, Design for Environ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amir Reza, Akhiani
Format: Thesis
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8099/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8099/5/Amir_Reza_Akhiani_(KGC060028).pdf
_version_ 1848773569670021120
author Amir Reza, Akhiani
author_facet Amir Reza, Akhiani
author_sort Amir Reza, Akhiani
building UM Research Repository
collection Online Access
description Tight competition between manufacturers forces them to look for new ways to increase productivity and quality and hence reduce costs. These efforts have led researchers to develop methods such as the DFX Tools: Design for Manufacturing, Design for Assembly, Design for Disassembly, Design for Environment, Design for Recyclability, etc. In this research, Design for Assembly (DFA) and Design for Disassembly (DFD) methods are used to analyze and optimize an automotive product. DFA reduces time and cost through parts reduction, which simplifies assembly and increases reliability. DFD reduces cost by hastening the recycling or dismantling processes (direct effect) and decreases environmental impact and damage to the environment (indirect effect). Most big manufacturing companies such as Sony, Hitachi, Ford, and Chrysler have their own method for implementing DFA and DFD, which are developed for a specific product. One of the oldest and general methods for DFA and DFD is the Boothroyd Method. The main goal of this research is to optimize assembly of the rear light of Proton Waja cars through supply of the assembly data to the DFA and DFD software, and to implement the software’s recommendations into improving the initial design. When compared with the old design, the new design markedly improves assembly, as shown by the DFA index and cost breakdown graph. The software considers only the cost reduction that is due to parts reduction; costs of producing new parts such as molds for the plastic parts or stamping die for the metallic parts were not considered.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T13:44:30Z
format Thesis
id um-8099
institution University Malaya
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T13:44:30Z
publishDate 2013
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling um-80992020-02-19T21:59:58Z Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani Amir Reza, Akhiani T Technology (General) TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Tight competition between manufacturers forces them to look for new ways to increase productivity and quality and hence reduce costs. These efforts have led researchers to develop methods such as the DFX Tools: Design for Manufacturing, Design for Assembly, Design for Disassembly, Design for Environment, Design for Recyclability, etc. In this research, Design for Assembly (DFA) and Design for Disassembly (DFD) methods are used to analyze and optimize an automotive product. DFA reduces time and cost through parts reduction, which simplifies assembly and increases reliability. DFD reduces cost by hastening the recycling or dismantling processes (direct effect) and decreases environmental impact and damage to the environment (indirect effect). Most big manufacturing companies such as Sony, Hitachi, Ford, and Chrysler have their own method for implementing DFA and DFD, which are developed for a specific product. One of the oldest and general methods for DFA and DFD is the Boothroyd Method. The main goal of this research is to optimize assembly of the rear light of Proton Waja cars through supply of the assembly data to the DFA and DFD software, and to implement the software’s recommendations into improving the initial design. When compared with the old design, the new design markedly improves assembly, as shown by the DFA index and cost breakdown graph. The software considers only the cost reduction that is due to parts reduction; costs of producing new parts such as molds for the plastic parts or stamping die for the metallic parts were not considered. 2013-11 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8099/5/Amir_Reza_Akhiani_(KGC060028).pdf Amir Reza, Akhiani (2013) Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani. Masters thesis, University of Malaya. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8099/
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Amir Reza, Akhiani
Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani
title Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani
title_full Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani
title_fullStr Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani
title_full_unstemmed Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani
title_short Product Benchmarking Using DFA and DFD Tools / Amir Reza Akhiani
title_sort product benchmarking using dfa and dfd tools / amir reza akhiani
topic T Technology (General)
TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
url http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8099/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8099/5/Amir_Reza_Akhiani_(KGC060028).pdf