Request strategies in email communication in a private institution / Marchie Lim Pin Sim
This paper investigates the ways in which staff members in the workplace of a private institution in Malaysia, realise requests in their email communications with special reference to politeness strategies as described by Brown and Levinson (1987) complemented by Spencer-Oatey’s (2008) rapport ma...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://pendeta.um.edu.my/client/default/search/results?qu=Request+strategies+in+email+communication+in+a+private+institution&te= http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/3988/1/1%2D_Marchie_%2D_Preface_with_Disser_Cover_n_Abstract.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/3988/2/2%2D_Marchie_%2D_Chap_1_%2D_5_Combined_Final.pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/3988/3/Binder1.pdf |
| Summary: | This paper investigates the ways in which staff members in the workplace of a private
institution in Malaysia, realise requests in their email communications with special
reference to politeness strategies as described by Brown and Levinson (1987)
complemented by Spencer-Oatey’s (2008) rapport management framework. It provides
a pragmatic analysis of the strategies of requests speech act and politeness phenomenon
in the production of request speech acts in the emails by staff members. It aims to
identify the politeness strategies employed with regards to face and rapport management
by staff members of different professional status when making requests in their email
communication with staff members of different positions of power. It explores the
lexical choices used to indicate politeness in the request emails and investigates the
politeness markers used in greetings, closings and the requests phrases. It seeks to find
out if there is a difference in the way they construct their sentences or whether the same
structures are used when communicating with people of different positions in an attempt
to analyse the correlation between social distance and the politeness strategies employed
and the institutional social norms for rapport management. It also seeks to establish if
recipients accommodate to politeness elements in their replies. The paper is based on
the analysis of fifty request emails written by four staff members to their subordinates,
peers and superior and the responses to the requests. The study is descriptive in nature
and frequencies and qualitative analysis are used. The findings of the study revealed
that staff members use similar forms of structural and verbal politeness forms in
opening, closing and requests phrases of their emails. In their requests, they tend to use
negative politeness strategies, especially with superiors or peers and direct strategies
with subordinates in their requests, mitigated with politeness markers. There is a
tendency to use hedges in the negative politeness strategies. It was also found that
recipients accommodate politeness in their reply emails. These negative politeness strategies and mitigators are also found to function as
linguistic devices to build rapport among the institution’s staff members. |
|---|