Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin

The study aimed to use an alternative method of assessing client outcomes, and service performance by using the outcome measure—Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM). Presently, the counselling psychology unit assesses the clients' outcomes by subjective observations and clients&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norainee , Kamaruddin
Format: Thesis
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/1/Norainee.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/2/Norainee.pdf
_version_ 1848775040963706880
author Norainee , Kamaruddin
author_facet Norainee , Kamaruddin
author_sort Norainee , Kamaruddin
building UM Research Repository
collection Online Access
description The study aimed to use an alternative method of assessing client outcomes, and service performance by using the outcome measure—Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM). Presently, the counselling psychology unit assesses the clients' outcomes by subjective observations and clients' self-reports. As for service performance, the counselling psychology units are assessed internally by each hospital's management system. In advanced countries, these methods have been replaced or augmented by standardised routine outcome measures. This study used CORE-OM to measure client outcomes, and it was also the benchmarking tool to set service performance standards. It adopted a mixed-method research design using survey and interview as data collection methods. The survey participants were clients from 13 counselling psychology units in selected government hospitals around the country, and the interview participants were the psychology officers (counselling). The data collection methodology had two phases. The first phase entailed the collection of pre- and post-CORE-OM questionnaires from 103 clients and the second phase, involved a semi-structured interview with three psychology officers (counselling). The findings showed that 9% of clients recovered, 66% of clients improved, 16% of clients showed no-change, and 10% of clients had deteriorated. The benchmarking tool—CORE-OM—had determined the service standards of each outcome category. Based on the benchmarking values, one unit achieved the standard for all outcome categories, while the rest showed average performances. The interviews revealed themes on unit evaluation, workforce needs, outcomes concept misunderstood, inappropriate tools, challenging counselling process and low mental health campaigns. These themes had impacted the quantitative findings, and they shed light on the interactions between the variables, which led to the counselling psychology units' average performance. The study has implications for theory, practice, training, and future research. The study hoped that the Ministry of Health would consider implementing CORE-OM for assessing client outcomes and as a benchmarking tool for assessing service performance.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T14:07:53Z
format Thesis
id um-14698
institution University Malaya
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T14:07:53Z
publishDate 2020
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling um-146982023-08-21T23:23:06Z Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin Norainee , Kamaruddin BF Psychology LC Special aspects of education The study aimed to use an alternative method of assessing client outcomes, and service performance by using the outcome measure—Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM). Presently, the counselling psychology unit assesses the clients' outcomes by subjective observations and clients' self-reports. As for service performance, the counselling psychology units are assessed internally by each hospital's management system. In advanced countries, these methods have been replaced or augmented by standardised routine outcome measures. This study used CORE-OM to measure client outcomes, and it was also the benchmarking tool to set service performance standards. It adopted a mixed-method research design using survey and interview as data collection methods. The survey participants were clients from 13 counselling psychology units in selected government hospitals around the country, and the interview participants were the psychology officers (counselling). The data collection methodology had two phases. The first phase entailed the collection of pre- and post-CORE-OM questionnaires from 103 clients and the second phase, involved a semi-structured interview with three psychology officers (counselling). The findings showed that 9% of clients recovered, 66% of clients improved, 16% of clients showed no-change, and 10% of clients had deteriorated. The benchmarking tool—CORE-OM—had determined the service standards of each outcome category. Based on the benchmarking values, one unit achieved the standard for all outcome categories, while the rest showed average performances. The interviews revealed themes on unit evaluation, workforce needs, outcomes concept misunderstood, inappropriate tools, challenging counselling process and low mental health campaigns. These themes had impacted the quantitative findings, and they shed light on the interactions between the variables, which led to the counselling psychology units' average performance. The study has implications for theory, practice, training, and future research. The study hoped that the Ministry of Health would consider implementing CORE-OM for assessing client outcomes and as a benchmarking tool for assessing service performance. 2020-09 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/1/Norainee.pdf application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/2/Norainee.pdf Norainee , Kamaruddin (2020) Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin. PhD thesis, Universiti Malaya. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/
spellingShingle BF Psychology
LC Special aspects of education
Norainee , Kamaruddin
Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin
title Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin
title_full Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin
title_fullStr Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin
title_full_unstemmed Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin
title_short Use of CORE-OM as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at Counselling Psychology Units in Malaysian government hospitals / Norainee Kamaruddin
title_sort use of core-om as a benchmarking tool for patient outcomes at counselling psychology units in malaysian government hospitals / norainee kamaruddin
topic BF Psychology
LC Special aspects of education
url http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/1/Norainee.pdf
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/14698/2/Norainee.pdf