Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph

Background: Shivering is a frequent complication following anaesthesia, with an incidence of between 40-60% and 36-55% following general and neuraxial anaesthesia respectively. Shivering following spinal anesthesia is associated with many adverse events. The pharmacological prevention for post sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James, Joseph
Format: Thesis
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11189/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11189/4/james.pdf
_version_ 1848774320188293120
author James, Joseph
author_facet James, Joseph
author_sort James, Joseph
building UM Research Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Shivering is a frequent complication following anaesthesia, with an incidence of between 40-60% and 36-55% following general and neuraxial anaesthesia respectively. Shivering following spinal anesthesia is associated with many adverse events. The pharmacological prevention for post spinal shivering is diverse and not standardized amongst anaesthetists and evidence based protocols has not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of oral administration of warm water administered prophylactically on the incidence of shivering after spinal anesthesia for Caesarean section. Methods: Pregnant women at term, undergoing low-risk elective and grade 3 emergency lower segment Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia were recruited into the study. They were randomly assigned to either to receive oral warm water after the delivery of the fetus or to receive routine care (pharmacological treatment). They were observed for shivering and graded according to Crossley & Mahajan grading if shivering develops. Results: 152 patients were recruited in the study, 75 in intervention arm and 77 in control arm. The overall incidence of shivering was 48%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of shivering between the interventional and control arms (49% v. 46%, p=0.888). Of those developed shivering, the majority (48%) had grade 3 (moderate) shivering. Two out of the 75 in the interventional arm reported mild adverse events (nausea and vomiting), which resolved upon reassuring them. iv Conclusion: There was no significant difference in shivering among those who received oral warm water as a prophylaxis against shivering compared to the standard care (monitoring and pharmacological treatment if shivering develops).
first_indexed 2025-11-14T13:56:25Z
format Thesis
id um-11189
institution University Malaya
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T13:56:25Z
publishDate 2018
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling um-111892020-07-19T18:35:55Z Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph James, Joseph R Medicine (General) RD Surgery Background: Shivering is a frequent complication following anaesthesia, with an incidence of between 40-60% and 36-55% following general and neuraxial anaesthesia respectively. Shivering following spinal anesthesia is associated with many adverse events. The pharmacological prevention for post spinal shivering is diverse and not standardized amongst anaesthetists and evidence based protocols has not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of oral administration of warm water administered prophylactically on the incidence of shivering after spinal anesthesia for Caesarean section. Methods: Pregnant women at term, undergoing low-risk elective and grade 3 emergency lower segment Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia were recruited into the study. They were randomly assigned to either to receive oral warm water after the delivery of the fetus or to receive routine care (pharmacological treatment). They were observed for shivering and graded according to Crossley & Mahajan grading if shivering develops. Results: 152 patients were recruited in the study, 75 in intervention arm and 77 in control arm. The overall incidence of shivering was 48%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of shivering between the interventional and control arms (49% v. 46%, p=0.888). Of those developed shivering, the majority (48%) had grade 3 (moderate) shivering. Two out of the 75 in the interventional arm reported mild adverse events (nausea and vomiting), which resolved upon reassuring them. iv Conclusion: There was no significant difference in shivering among those who received oral warm water as a prophylaxis against shivering compared to the standard care (monitoring and pharmacological treatment if shivering develops). 2018 Thesis NonPeerReviewed application/pdf http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11189/4/james.pdf James, Joseph (2018) Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph. Masters thesis, University of Malaya. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11189/
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
RD Surgery
James, Joseph
Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph
title Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph
title_full Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph
title_fullStr Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph
title_full_unstemmed Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph
title_short Does prophylactic PER oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / James Joseph
title_sort does prophylactic per oral warm water intake reduce incidence of shivering / james joseph
topic R Medicine (General)
RD Surgery
url http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11189/
http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/11189/4/james.pdf