Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia

The Malaysian law has provided a specific defence to a child offender within the ages of ten to twelve. Nevertheless, the accused child must prove that at the time of committing the crime, he or she has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequence of the act....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anita Abdul Rahim
Format: Article
Published: Fakulti Undang - Undang 2010
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1707/
_version_ 1848809627435663360
author Anita Abdul Rahim,
author_facet Anita Abdul Rahim,
author_sort Anita Abdul Rahim,
building UKM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The Malaysian law has provided a specific defence to a child offender within the ages of ten to twelve. Nevertheless, the accused child must prove that at the time of committing the crime, he or she has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequence of the act. How is ‘immaturity’ defined by the courts and how do the courts apply this particular defence to exempt the child from his or her criminal liability? These questions are highlighted in this article and it is submitted that the Malaysian courts have never interpreted ‘ immaturity’ in the provision of section 83 of the Malaysian Penal Code, which subsequently leads to the finding that its application is vague and ambiguous
first_indexed 2025-11-14T23:17:37Z
format Article
id ukm-1707
institution Universiti Kebangasaan Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T23:17:37Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Fakulti Undang - Undang
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling ukm-17072019-05-14T04:43:55Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1707/ Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia Anita Abdul Rahim, The Malaysian law has provided a specific defence to a child offender within the ages of ten to twelve. Nevertheless, the accused child must prove that at the time of committing the crime, he or she has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge the nature and consequence of the act. How is ‘immaturity’ defined by the courts and how do the courts apply this particular defence to exempt the child from his or her criminal liability? These questions are highlighted in this article and it is submitted that the Malaysian courts have never interpreted ‘ immaturity’ in the provision of section 83 of the Malaysian Penal Code, which subsequently leads to the finding that its application is vague and ambiguous Fakulti Undang - Undang 2010 Article PeerReviewed Anita Abdul Rahim, (2010) Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia. Jurnal Undang-undang, 14 . ISSN 1394-7729 http://ejournal.ukm.my/juum
spellingShingle Anita Abdul Rahim,
Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia
title Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia
title_full Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia
title_fullStr Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia
title_short Lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di Malaysia
title_sort lakuna dalam pemakaian dalihan ketidakmatangan menurut undang-undang jenayah di malaysia
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1707/
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/1707/