The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.]
The main concern of this research is to make a comparison on the new amended law in Malaysia which is the Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) Act 2013 (POCA) with Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) Act 2013 (CLTPA) on the effectiveness of the act pertaining to the criminal offe...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Student Project |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/36119/ |
| _version_ | 1848808966086197248 |
|---|---|
| author | Jamil, Nadrah Mohd Hussin, Nur Haffida Mohammad Nawawi, Nurfatihah Sulaiman, Siti Shawarti |
| author_facet | Jamil, Nadrah Mohd Hussin, Nur Haffida Mohammad Nawawi, Nurfatihah Sulaiman, Siti Shawarti |
| author_sort | Jamil, Nadrah |
| building | UiTM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The main concern of this research is to make a comparison on the new amended law in Malaysia which is the Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) Act 2013 (POCA) with Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) Act 2013 (CLTPA) on the effectiveness of the act pertaining to the criminal offences. The comparative issues will cover on 3 aspects where the first issue is the amended law excludes the provision of judicial review. Secondly on the issue of POCA 2013 denying the right to legal representation and perceived by many as being violation to the justice system in Malaysia and lastly on the issue of the incomprehensiveness of the law to stop any future abuse of power. Discussion is also made on the development of the preventive detention legislation in Malaysia and Singapore is being referred to as a model in this aspect. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T23:07:06Z |
| format | Student Project |
| id | uitm-36119 |
| institution | Universiti Teknologi MARA |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T23:07:06Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | uitm-361192020-11-06T02:32:14Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/36119/ The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.] Jamil, Nadrah Mohd Hussin, Nur Haffida Mohammad Nawawi, Nurfatihah Sulaiman, Siti Shawarti Administration of criminal justice The main concern of this research is to make a comparison on the new amended law in Malaysia which is the Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) Act 2013 (POCA) with Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) Act 2013 (CLTPA) on the effectiveness of the act pertaining to the criminal offences. The comparative issues will cover on 3 aspects where the first issue is the amended law excludes the provision of judicial review. Secondly on the issue of POCA 2013 denying the right to legal representation and perceived by many as being violation to the justice system in Malaysia and lastly on the issue of the incomprehensiveness of the law to stop any future abuse of power. Discussion is also made on the development of the preventive detention legislation in Malaysia and Singapore is being referred to as a model in this aspect. 2014 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/36119/1/36119.pdf Jamil, Nadrah and Mohd Hussin, Nur Haffida and Mohammad Nawawi, Nurfatihah and Sulaiman, Siti Shawarti (2014) The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.]. (2014) [Student Project] (Unpublished) |
| spellingShingle | Administration of criminal justice Jamil, Nadrah Mohd Hussin, Nur Haffida Mohammad Nawawi, Nurfatihah Sulaiman, Siti Shawarti The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.] |
| title | The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.] |
| title_full | The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.] |
| title_fullStr | The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.] |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.] |
| title_short | The Prevention of Crime (Amendment and Extension) ACT 2013: a comparison with the Criminal Law (Temporary Provision) (Amendment) ACT 2013 of Singapore / Nadrah Jamil … [et al.] |
| title_sort | prevention of crime (amendment and extension) act 2013: a comparison with the criminal law (temporary provision) (amendment) act 2013 of singapore / nadrah jamil … [et al.] |
| topic | Administration of criminal justice |
| url | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/36119/ |