Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]
The movement of green building was started after the Agenda21. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction highlighted the main challenges that sustainable development presents to the construction industry. The Agenda had an important role in the creation of gree...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/ |
| _version_ | 1848808105013411840 |
|---|---|
| author | Halmi, Zainol Fadhilah, Che Aziz Suharto, Teriman Haryati, Mohd Isa Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar |
| author_facet | Halmi, Zainol Fadhilah, Che Aziz Suharto, Teriman Haryati, Mohd Isa Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar |
| author_sort | Halmi, Zainol |
| building | UiTM Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | The movement of green building was started after the Agenda21. International Council for Research and
Innovation in Building and Construction highlighted the main challenges that sustainable development presents to
the construction industry. The Agenda had an important role in the creation of green assessment tools in building
industry. An international project coordinated from Canada namely GB Tool (Green Building Tool) was the first
attempt to develop green rating tool. The awareness has emerged the implementation of various rating tools such
as LEED, CASBEE, BREEAM and GreenMark developed by the United States of America, Japan, United Kingdom and Singapore respectively. Many rating systems can be developed in different regions that lookquite different, but
share a common methodology and set of terms. In Malaysia, a new set of rating tool was developed by the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (REHDA) known as GreenRE. This paper reviews the GreenRE and compare it with GreenMark and BREEAM. Since the latter were more established, this paper will study strengths, weaknesses, gaps and issue within the GreenRE. With the outcome of this study, it may help both the authority and industry-players to prepare a comprehensive assessment tool that suit to local practice. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T22:53:25Z |
| format | Conference or Workshop Item |
| id | uitm-32753 |
| institution | Universiti Teknologi MARA |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T22:53:25Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | uitm-327532020-07-27T05:57:15Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/ Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] Halmi, Zainol Fadhilah, Che Aziz Suharto, Teriman Haryati, Mohd Isa Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar Architectural engineering. Structural engineering of buildings Sustainable buildings. Sustainable construction The movement of green building was started after the Agenda21. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction highlighted the main challenges that sustainable development presents to the construction industry. The Agenda had an important role in the creation of green assessment tools in building industry. An international project coordinated from Canada namely GB Tool (Green Building Tool) was the first attempt to develop green rating tool. The awareness has emerged the implementation of various rating tools such as LEED, CASBEE, BREEAM and GreenMark developed by the United States of America, Japan, United Kingdom and Singapore respectively. Many rating systems can be developed in different regions that lookquite different, but share a common methodology and set of terms. In Malaysia, a new set of rating tool was developed by the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (REHDA) known as GreenRE. This paper reviews the GreenRE and compare it with GreenMark and BREEAM. Since the latter were more established, this paper will study strengths, weaknesses, gaps and issue within the GreenRE. With the outcome of this study, it may help both the authority and industry-players to prepare a comprehensive assessment tool that suit to local practice. 2015 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/1/32753.pdf Halmi, Zainol and Fadhilah, Che Aziz and Suharto, Teriman and Haryati, Mohd Isa and Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar (2015) Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.]. (2015) In: Proceedings of Postgraduate Conference on Global Green Issues (Go Green), 7-8 October 2015, Dewan Kuliah Al-Khawarizmi Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak. |
| spellingShingle | Architectural engineering. Structural engineering of buildings Sustainable buildings. Sustainable construction Halmi, Zainol Fadhilah, Che Aziz Suharto, Teriman Haryati, Mohd Isa Muhamad Asri, Abdullah Kamar Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] |
| title | Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s
GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] |
| title_full | Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s
GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] |
| title_fullStr | Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s
GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s
GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] |
| title_short | Reviewon Malaysia’s GreenRE in comparison with Singapore’s
GreenMark and UK’s BREEAM / Halmi Zainol ... [et al.] |
| title_sort | reviewon malaysia’s greenre in comparison with singapore’s
greenmark and uk’s breeam / halmi zainol ... [et al.] |
| topic | Architectural engineering. Structural engineering of buildings Sustainable buildings. Sustainable construction |
| url | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32753/ |