A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]

The importance of this research is to see the distinctions of the implementation of the law of sedition between Malaysia and the United States. There is a need to analyze the provisions under Malaysian Sedition Act 1948 and Section 2384 of The United States Code: Title 18 relating to the offence of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zakaria, Amirah, Sharifiidin, Intan Izureen, Hussin, Siti Muneera, Muhammad, Suria
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31794/
_version_ 1848807852559302656
author Zakaria, Amirah
Sharifiidin, Intan Izureen
Hussin, Siti Muneera
Muhammad, Suria
author_facet Zakaria, Amirah
Sharifiidin, Intan Izureen
Hussin, Siti Muneera
Muhammad, Suria
author_sort Zakaria, Amirah
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The importance of this research is to see the distinctions of the implementation of the law of sedition between Malaysia and the United States. There is a need to analyze the provisions under Malaysian Sedition Act 1948 and Section 2384 of The United States Code: Title 18 relating to the offence of sedition to compare the implementation of law of sedition having between in Malaysia and the United States, "A Comparison Study between Sedition Law in Malaysia and the United States" is the title of this project paper. There are two main objectives to this study which are to analyze the purpose and the scope of the sedition law in both Malaysia and the United States and to critically examine the enforcement and application of the sedition law in Malaysia and the United States. This is due to the fact that although both Malaysia and the United States have provisions regarding sedition offences, there are different restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression imposed especially in terms of its implementation. This research focuses on the sedition law in Malaysia and the United States also in brief to other country such as United Kingdom. The qualitative type of research techniques, a library-based research, and semi-structured interviews were used in carrying out this research.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T22:49:24Z
format Student Project
id uitm-31794
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T22:49:24Z
publishDate 2010
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling uitm-317942024-03-12T08:18:31Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31794/ A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.] Zakaria, Amirah Sharifiidin, Intan Izureen Hussin, Siti Muneera Muhammad, Suria National territory Foreign relations administration The importance of this research is to see the distinctions of the implementation of the law of sedition between Malaysia and the United States. There is a need to analyze the provisions under Malaysian Sedition Act 1948 and Section 2384 of The United States Code: Title 18 relating to the offence of sedition to compare the implementation of law of sedition having between in Malaysia and the United States, "A Comparison Study between Sedition Law in Malaysia and the United States" is the title of this project paper. There are two main objectives to this study which are to analyze the purpose and the scope of the sedition law in both Malaysia and the United States and to critically examine the enforcement and application of the sedition law in Malaysia and the United States. This is due to the fact that although both Malaysia and the United States have provisions regarding sedition offences, there are different restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression imposed especially in terms of its implementation. This research focuses on the sedition law in Malaysia and the United States also in brief to other country such as United Kingdom. The qualitative type of research techniques, a library-based research, and semi-structured interviews were used in carrying out this research. 2010 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31794/1/31794.pdf Zakaria, Amirah and Sharifiidin, Intan Izureen and Hussin, Siti Muneera and Muhammad, Suria (2010) A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]. (2010) [Student Project] <http://terminalib.uitm.edu.my/31794.pdf> (Unpublished)
spellingShingle National territory
Foreign relations administration
Zakaria, Amirah
Sharifiidin, Intan Izureen
Hussin, Siti Muneera
Muhammad, Suria
A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]
title A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]
title_full A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]
title_fullStr A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]
title_short A comparative study between sedition law in Malaysia and The United States / Amirah Zakaria…[et al.]
title_sort comparative study between sedition law in malaysia and the united states / amirah zakaria…[et al.]
topic National territory
Foreign relations administration
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/31794/