Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali

Contrast sensitivity is described as the ability of visual system to distinguish between an object and its background. There are various clinical tests that measure contrast sensitivity, among those are the Vistech versions (VCTS 6500 and MCT-8000), Vector Vision CSV-1000 and the widely used Functio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ozali, Nurul Hanani
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: Faculty Of Health Sciences 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26098/
_version_ 1848806439270744064
author Ozali, Nurul Hanani
author_facet Ozali, Nurul Hanani
author_sort Ozali, Nurul Hanani
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Contrast sensitivity is described as the ability of visual system to distinguish between an object and its background. There are various clinical tests that measure contrast sensitivity, among those are the Vistech versions (VCTS 6500 and MCT-8000), Vector Vision CSV-1000 and the widely used Functional Acuity Contrast Test (F.A.C.T.). Thus, chart with different illumination may have different effect in measuring contrast sensitivity. Hence, the aim of this study to find the differences of luminance effect by FACT screen test, illuminated CSV-1000 and non- illuminated CSV-1000. A total of 38 subjects with habitual visual acuity of 6/6 were included in this study. Visual acuity and refraction were taken using Snellen Chart. While the measuring of contrast sensitivity were done with three types of charts; FACT chart, non-illuminated CSV-1000 and illuminated CSV-1000. There were statistically significance differences in the measuring contrast sensitivity for 6 cyles per degree of spatial frequencies using non-illuminated CSV-1000 and for 18 cycles per degree of spatial frequencies using illuminated CSV-1000 that showed a level significance p < 0.50. However, there WAS no significant difference for FACT screen test for measuring all spatial frequencies level. Next, there is major significant difference between the charts in measuring contrast sensitivity. Hence, this show the presence of illuminance of the charts also affecting the results of contrast sensitivity levels.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T22:26:57Z
format Student Project
id uitm-26098
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T22:26:57Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Faculty Of Health Sciences
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling uitm-260982023-03-08T02:05:27Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26098/ Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali Ozali, Nurul Hanani Optometry. Opticians. Eyeglasses Contrast sensitivity is described as the ability of visual system to distinguish between an object and its background. There are various clinical tests that measure contrast sensitivity, among those are the Vistech versions (VCTS 6500 and MCT-8000), Vector Vision CSV-1000 and the widely used Functional Acuity Contrast Test (F.A.C.T.). Thus, chart with different illumination may have different effect in measuring contrast sensitivity. Hence, the aim of this study to find the differences of luminance effect by FACT screen test, illuminated CSV-1000 and non- illuminated CSV-1000. A total of 38 subjects with habitual visual acuity of 6/6 were included in this study. Visual acuity and refraction were taken using Snellen Chart. While the measuring of contrast sensitivity were done with three types of charts; FACT chart, non-illuminated CSV-1000 and illuminated CSV-1000. There were statistically significance differences in the measuring contrast sensitivity for 6 cyles per degree of spatial frequencies using non-illuminated CSV-1000 and for 18 cycles per degree of spatial frequencies using illuminated CSV-1000 that showed a level significance p < 0.50. However, there WAS no significant difference for FACT screen test for measuring all spatial frequencies level. Next, there is major significant difference between the charts in measuring contrast sensitivity. Hence, this show the presence of illuminance of the charts also affecting the results of contrast sensitivity levels. Faculty Of Health Sciences 2015 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26098/1/PPb_NURUL%20HANANI%20OZALI%20HS%2015_5.pdf Ozali, Nurul Hanani (2015) Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali. (2015) [Student Project] <http://terminalib.uitm.edu.my/26098.pdf> (Unpublished)
spellingShingle Optometry. Opticians. Eyeglasses
Ozali, Nurul Hanani
Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali
title Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali
title_full Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali
title_fullStr Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali
title_short Comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / Nurul Hanani Ozali
title_sort comparison of contrast sensitivity between fact screen test, illuminated and non-illuminated csv-1000 among university students / nurul hanani ozali
topic Optometry. Opticians. Eyeglasses
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/26098/