V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki

The investigation was conducted to evaluate technical aspect of machine performance and economic feasibility between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation. This study used two type of paddy cultivation machine which is Kubota rice transplanter used for transplanting method and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Zuki, Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat
Format: Student Project
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/23994/
_version_ 1848805876892172288
author M. Zuki, Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat
author_facet M. Zuki, Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat
author_sort M. Zuki, Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat
building UiTM Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The investigation was conducted to evaluate technical aspect of machine performance and economic feasibility between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation. This study used two type of paddy cultivation machine which is Kubota rice transplanter used for transplanting method and knapsack mounted motorized blower used for direct seeding method to operate this study in Paya Keladi, Seberang Perai, Pulau Pinang paddy field during June until November 2016. Both planting method had three unit plots of sized 100 m x 100 m each with two treatments and three replications. The operational performance from the result showed the field efficiency of the direct seeding method and transplanting method were 70.00 % and 63.58 %, respectively. Percent missing seedlings in transplanting method were 5.56 % while the direct seeding method was observed no missing seedlings. The planting efficiency of direct seeding method and transplanting method were 94.44 % and 100 %, respectively. Rice cultivated with transplanting method resulted in higher average yield of 11.20 tons/ha than direct seeding method resulted average yield of 9.10 tons/ha. The total production costs were RM 3770 per ha and RM 4420 per ha for direct seeding and transplanting methods, respectively. The net return for direct seeding method and transplanting method were RM 5785 and RM 7340, respectively. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) was 2.66 and 2.53 for transplanting method and direct seeding method, respectively. For economic planting of rice, the Kubota rice transplanter should have above 10 ha/yr of area coverage. The result showed that the transplanting method is more economic over the direct seeding method.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T22:18:00Z
format Student Project
id uitm-23994
institution Universiti Teknologi MARA
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T22:18:00Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling uitm-239942020-08-06T04:08:01Z https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/23994/ V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki M. Zuki, Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat S Agriculture (General) Seeds. Seed technology Agricultural machinery. Farm machinery The investigation was conducted to evaluate technical aspect of machine performance and economic feasibility between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation. This study used two type of paddy cultivation machine which is Kubota rice transplanter used for transplanting method and knapsack mounted motorized blower used for direct seeding method to operate this study in Paya Keladi, Seberang Perai, Pulau Pinang paddy field during June until November 2016. Both planting method had three unit plots of sized 100 m x 100 m each with two treatments and three replications. The operational performance from the result showed the field efficiency of the direct seeding method and transplanting method were 70.00 % and 63.58 %, respectively. Percent missing seedlings in transplanting method were 5.56 % while the direct seeding method was observed no missing seedlings. The planting efficiency of direct seeding method and transplanting method were 94.44 % and 100 %, respectively. Rice cultivated with transplanting method resulted in higher average yield of 11.20 tons/ha than direct seeding method resulted average yield of 9.10 tons/ha. The total production costs were RM 3770 per ha and RM 4420 per ha for direct seeding and transplanting methods, respectively. The net return for direct seeding method and transplanting method were RM 5785 and RM 7340, respectively. The benefit cost ratio (BCR) was 2.66 and 2.53 for transplanting method and direct seeding method, respectively. For economic planting of rice, the Kubota rice transplanter should have above 10 ha/yr of area coverage. The result showed that the transplanting method is more economic over the direct seeding method. Faculty of Plantation and Agrotechnology 2017 Student Project NonPeerReviewed text en https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/23994/1/23994.pdf M. Zuki, Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat (2017) V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki. (2017) [Student Project] <http://terminalib.uitm.edu.my/23994.pdf> (Unpublished)
spellingShingle S Agriculture (General)
Seeds. Seed technology
Agricultural machinery. Farm machinery
M. Zuki, Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat
V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki
title V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki
title_full V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki
title_fullStr V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki
title_full_unstemmed V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki
title_short V Techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / Mohamad Hanif Nur Hidayat M. Zuki
title_sort v techno-economic comparison between direct seeding and transplanting method in rice cultivation: a case study / mohamad hanif nur hidayat m. zuki
topic S Agriculture (General)
Seeds. Seed technology
Agricultural machinery. Farm machinery
url https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/23994/