Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department

In interventional radiology attendant staff can be exposed to significant doses from the radiation scattered from the patient, giving rise to heterogeneous energy distribution, exposure occurring over extended periods of time. Protection of staff is a prime concern, also including reducing the risk...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alkhorayef, M., Al-Mohammed, H.I., Mayhoub, Fareed H., Sulieman, Abdelmoneim, Salah, Hassan, Yousef, M., Alomair, Othman I., Bradley, D.A. *
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/1574/
_version_ 1848802090319609856
author Alkhorayef, M.
Al-Mohammed, H.I.
Mayhoub, Fareed H.
Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
Salah, Hassan
Yousef, M.
Alomair, Othman I.
Bradley, D.A. *
author_facet Alkhorayef, M.
Al-Mohammed, H.I.
Mayhoub, Fareed H.
Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
Salah, Hassan
Yousef, M.
Alomair, Othman I.
Bradley, D.A. *
author_sort Alkhorayef, M.
building SU Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In interventional radiology attendant staff can be exposed to significant doses from the radiation scattered from the patient, giving rise to heterogeneous energy distribution, exposure occurring over extended periods of time. Protection of staff is a prime concern, also including reducing the risk of carcinogenesis. With only limited published studies available, as in for instance in regard to lens opacifications, further evaluation of staff exposures and assessment of radiation protection techniques and measures are crucial. Present study has sought to evaluate staff radiation exposure in a radiology department that performs interventional procedures. Annual occupational exposures were obtained for 32 personnel (6 females and 26 males) in a radiology department at a tertiary hospital. Personal dose equivalent Hp (d) was measured in terms of Hp (0.07) (shallow dose) and Hp (10) (deep dose). The measurements were made over a period of two consecutive years, 2017 and 2018, use being made of TLD-100 thermoluminescent dosimeters. In units of mSv, the corresponding average annual dose equivalent and range for Hp (10) and Hp (0.07) were 4.6 ± 7.0 (0.1–25.5) and 5.1 ± 7.3 (0.1–25.5). Notably, 16% of staff received doses that were greater than the annual dose limit. Since Hp (10) offers a conservative evaluation of effective dose, evaluation of the working environment is necessary in seeking to ensure dose values remain below annual dose limits.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T21:17:49Z
format Article
id sunway-1574
institution Sunway University
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T21:17:49Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling sunway-15742021-02-11T08:22:48Z http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/1574/ Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department Alkhorayef, M. Al-Mohammed, H.I. Mayhoub, Fareed H. Sulieman, Abdelmoneim Salah, Hassan Yousef, M. Alomair, Othman I. Bradley, D.A. * R895-920 Medical Physics/Medical Radiology In interventional radiology attendant staff can be exposed to significant doses from the radiation scattered from the patient, giving rise to heterogeneous energy distribution, exposure occurring over extended periods of time. Protection of staff is a prime concern, also including reducing the risk of carcinogenesis. With only limited published studies available, as in for instance in regard to lens opacifications, further evaluation of staff exposures and assessment of radiation protection techniques and measures are crucial. Present study has sought to evaluate staff radiation exposure in a radiology department that performs interventional procedures. Annual occupational exposures were obtained for 32 personnel (6 females and 26 males) in a radiology department at a tertiary hospital. Personal dose equivalent Hp (d) was measured in terms of Hp (0.07) (shallow dose) and Hp (10) (deep dose). The measurements were made over a period of two consecutive years, 2017 and 2018, use being made of TLD-100 thermoluminescent dosimeters. In units of mSv, the corresponding average annual dose equivalent and range for Hp (10) and Hp (0.07) were 4.6 ± 7.0 (0.1–25.5) and 5.1 ± 7.3 (0.1–25.5). Notably, 16% of staff received doses that were greater than the annual dose limit. Since Hp (10) offers a conservative evaluation of effective dose, evaluation of the working environment is necessary in seeking to ensure dose values remain below annual dose limits. Elsevier 2021-06 Article PeerReviewed Alkhorayef, M. and Al-Mohammed, H.I. and Mayhoub, Fareed H. and Sulieman, Abdelmoneim and Salah, Hassan and Yousef, M. and Alomair, Othman I. and Bradley, D.A. * (2021) Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 178. p. 108999. ISSN 0969-806X http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108999 doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108999
spellingShingle R895-920 Medical Physics/Medical Radiology
Alkhorayef, M.
Al-Mohammed, H.I.
Mayhoub, Fareed H.
Sulieman, Abdelmoneim
Salah, Hassan
Yousef, M.
Alomair, Othman I.
Bradley, D.A. *
Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department
title Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department
title_full Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department
title_fullStr Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department
title_full_unstemmed Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department
title_short Staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department
title_sort staff radiation dose and estimated risk in an interventional radiology department
topic R895-920 Medical Physics/Medical Radiology
url http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/1574/
http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/1574/
http://eprints.sunway.edu.my/1574/