Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation
This paper presents a conceptual model of agreement options on negotiation support for civil engineering decision. The negotiation support facilitates the solving of group choice decision making problems in civil engineering decision to reduce the impact of mud volcano disaster in Sidoarjo, Indones...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Citation Index Journal |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
World Academy Science, Engineering and Technology
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/923/ http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/923/1/v1-1-2.pdf |
| _version_ | 1848659058198839296 |
|---|---|
| author | Utomo, Christiono Idrus, Arazi Napiah, M Khamidi, M. Faris |
| author_facet | Utomo, Christiono Idrus, Arazi Napiah, M Khamidi, M. Faris |
| author_sort | Utomo, Christiono |
| building | UTP Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This paper presents a conceptual model of agreement
options on negotiation support for civil engineering decision. The negotiation support facilitates the solving of group choice decision making problems in civil engineering decision to reduce the impact of mud volcano disaster in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. The approach based
on application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi criteria decision on three level of decision hierarchy. Decisions for reducing impact is very complicated since many parties involved in a critical time. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution
alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing stakeholder preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a group choice decision support is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into
negotiation with the other stakeholders. Such civil engineering solutions as alternatives are referred to as agreement options that are determined by identifying the possible stakeholder choice, followed by determining the optimal solution for each group of stakeholder.
Determination of the optimal solution is based on a game theory model of n-person general sum game with complete information that involves forming coalitions among stakeholders. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-13T07:24:23Z |
| format | Citation Index Journal |
| id | oai:scholars.utp.edu.my:923 |
| institution | Universiti Teknologi Petronas |
| institution_category | Local University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-13T07:24:23Z |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publisher | World Academy Science, Engineering and Technology |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | oai:scholars.utp.edu.my:9232017-01-19T08:25:58Z http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/923/ Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation Utomo, Christiono Idrus, Arazi Napiah, M Khamidi, M. Faris Q Science (General) This paper presents a conceptual model of agreement options on negotiation support for civil engineering decision. The negotiation support facilitates the solving of group choice decision making problems in civil engineering decision to reduce the impact of mud volcano disaster in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. The approach based on application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method for multi criteria decision on three level of decision hierarchy. Decisions for reducing impact is very complicated since many parties involved in a critical time. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing stakeholder preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a group choice decision support is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Such civil engineering solutions as alternatives are referred to as agreement options that are determined by identifying the possible stakeholder choice, followed by determining the optimal solution for each group of stakeholder. Determination of the optimal solution is based on a game theory model of n-person general sum game with complete information that involves forming coalitions among stakeholders. World Academy Science, Engineering and Technology 2009 Citation Index Journal PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/923/1/v1-1-2.pdf Utomo, Christiono and Idrus, Arazi and Napiah, M and Khamidi, M. Faris (2009) Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation. [Citation Index Journal] http://www.waset.org/journals/ijmss/ |
| spellingShingle | Q Science (General) Utomo, Christiono Idrus, Arazi Napiah, M Khamidi, M. Faris Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation |
| title | Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation |
| title_full | Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation |
| title_fullStr | Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation |
| title_short | Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation |
| title_sort | agreement options on multi criteria group decision and negotiation |
| topic | Q Science (General) |
| url | http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/923/ http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/923/ http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/923/1/v1-1-2.pdf |